It is argued that that the people can not affect positively on their habitat, but also either public administrators or big enterprises alone can perform it. I disagree that administrators and firm alone can effect improvement to the territory because the people are closer to their home as well as have the time to execute a project that can boost the surroundings.
To start with, the administrators and big organization can not achieve the betterment of the territory due to the fact that they are far from the surroundings. This is because the people have the direct contact to the habitat, which can better their home. Take for instance, my community leaders tend to construct a new road, they contacted public officials and large organisations, but they turn a deft hear to the complain, which lead the people to upgrade the road by themselves. Hence, the surroundings can only be upgraded by the people.
Another point to consider is that both the public officers and the large enterprise have less time to affect positively on the territory. In fact, they are busy to concentrate on it, but the people alone have the time to boost it. Take for example, the time spent on gathering documents funds can not be compared but the citizen has enough chances to upgrade territory when they are ready to effect it. As a result of this, projects are being delayed.
In conclusion, people would not achieve the improvement of their home, however public officers and reputable organizations alone can boost the habitat. I disagree with this statement because only the citizens are close and have the time to resolve and better their habitat.
It
is argued
that that
the
people
can not affect
positively
on their
habitat
,
but
also
either
public
administrators or
big
enterprises
alone
can perform it. I disagree that administrators and firm
alone
can effect improvement to the
territory
because
the
people
are closer to their home
as well
as have the
time
to execute a project that can boost the surroundings.
To
start
with, the administrators and
big
organization can not achieve the betterment of the
territory
due to the fact that they are far from the surroundings. This is
because
the
people
have the direct contact to the
habitat
, which can better their home. Take
for instance
, my community leaders tend to construct a new road, they contacted
public
officials and large
organisations
,
but
they turn a deft hear to the
complain
, which lead the
people
to upgrade the road by themselves.
Hence
, the surroundings can
only
be upgraded
by the
people
.
Another point to consider is that both the
public
officers and the large enterprise have less
time
to affect
positively
on the
territory
. In fact, they are busy to concentrate on it,
but
the
people
alone
have the
time
to boost it. Take
for example
, the
time
spent on gathering documents funds can not
be compared
but
the citizen has
enough
chances to upgrade
territory
when they are ready to effect it.
As a result
of this, projects are
being delayed
.
In conclusion
,
people
would not achieve the improvement of their home,
however
public
officers and reputable organizations
alone
can boost the
habitat
. I disagree with this statement
because
only
the citizens are close and have the
time
to resolve and better their
habitat
.