Globalisation is a catch-all term that refers to any activity that involves more than one country, for example, travels from one country to another. The dramatic increase in transnational travel in recent years has sparked controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individual countries, especially those new member states of globalisation. Some people are concerned that the upsurge in new arrivals will prompt local hostility-against visitors, instead of promoting
their understanding on mutual cultural background. This notion should be rejected as one can see many facts in favour of this development between countries.
The first reason why international travels would never bring conflict is rooted inthe fact that both visitors and locals are economically motivated. International travel opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs are interested not only in the domestic market but also in the overseas market. Foreigners should learn the culture of a country before winning over the local people. In turn, locals should show their hospitality to visitors in exchange for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each other' s cultural background is a necessary condition for cooperation.
Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might make the discrepancy
of foreigners and local inhabitants on some issues indelible; however, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and understanding. Arabians, for example, used to consider westerners as their foes. Now they have concrete relations with their western allies in many fields. In the initial stage, their divergence seemed inherent but over time, with better mutual understanding, they take the same position on many issues.
Undeniably, it is likely that in some resorts, foreign visitors repelthe local community with their scant
regard for the local environment and conventions when they first arrive. However, it should be noted that most offense is accidental, rather than intentional. Instead, visitors disobey rules and conventions simply because they have no knowledge of them. This situation is expected to be improved with the passing of time when visitors from different countries increase their knowledge of a local culture.
According to the above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the international travel should not be taken as the cause of any conflict that arises between two countries. Alternatively, one should recognise its role in improving mutual understanding between two countries.
Globalisation
is a catch-all term that refers to any activity that involves more than one
country
,
for example
,
travels
from one
country
to another. The dramatic increase in transnational
travel
in recent years has sparked controversy over the potential impacts of this trend on individual
countries
,
especially
those new member states of
globalisation
.
Some
people
are concerned
that the upsurge in new arrivals will prompt
local
hostility-against
visitors
,
instead
of
promoting
their
understanding
on mutual cultural background. This notion should
be rejected
as one can
see
many
facts in
favour
of this development between countries.
The
first
reason why international
travels
would never bring conflict
is rooted
inthe
fact that both
visitors
and
locals
are
economically
motivated. International
travel
opens up opportunities for business development throughout the world. Entrepreneurs
are interested
not
only
in the domestic market
but
also
in the overseas market. Foreigners should learn the culture of a
country
before
winning over the
local
people
. In turn,
locals
should
show
their hospitality to
visitors
in exchange for their trust. They share a view that acceptance of each
other&
#039; s cultural background is a necessary condition for cooperation.
Understanding a culture has other implications. Differences in social background, cultural values and religious belief might
make
the
discrepancy
of
foreigners and
local
inhabitants on
some
issues indelible;
however
, the higher interaction, the higher level of communication and
understanding
. Arabians,
for example
,
used
to consider westerners as their foes.
Now
they have concrete relations with their western allies in
many
fields. In the initial stage, their divergence seemed inherent
but
over time, with better mutual
understanding
, they take the same position on
many
issues.
Undeniably
, it is likely that in
some
resorts, foreign
visitors
repelthe
local
community with their scant
regard
for the
local
environment and conventions when they
first
arrive.
However
, it should
be noted
that most offense is accidental,
rather
than intentional.
Instead
,
visitors
disobey
rules
and conventions
simply
because
they have no knowledge of them. This situation is
expected
to be
improved
with the passing of time when
visitors
from
different
countries
increase their knowledge of a
local
culture.
According to the above analysis, we can observe that the increase in the international
travel
should not
be taken
as the cause of any conflict that arises between two
countries
.
Alternatively
, one should
recognise
its role in improving mutual
understanding
between two
countries
.