The best solution for reducing the level of traffic congestion and the problems of pollution is increasing the cost of fossil fuel. I am of the opinion that I partially agree with this statement. The supporting reasons will be given in the following paragraphs.
Increasing the price of gasoline can be seen as the best solution that possibly improves traffic jams and pollution for various reasons. The first and conceivably most obvious reason for this is the decreasing number of vehicles, resulting in people have more expenditure that is contributed to using public transportation. A clear illustration of this is that people who have a stable income might be impact on their daily lifes. Due to the fact that they are likely to use public transportations instead of private cars because it is cheaper than petrol prices. This solution brings about the fewer carsare used, the less co2 are emitted.
On the other hand, there are convincing arguments to calm that increasing the price of gas is not the best way. The most important one is that restricted cars in each area, especially the heart of the city. It is more efficient and realistic due to the fact that (the) controlling gas price is too difficult and complicated. It, as a consequence, effects a variety of factors such as land and air transports. Last but not least, encouraging people to use more public transport is another clear reason to consider. If governments campaign effectively, more and more people will using private cars instead.
To conclude, although the price of gas is increased, it can solve the problems in the short term. Therefore, (authority and) the government should cooperate to figure out this problem in the long term.
The best solution for reducing the level of traffic congestion and the problems of pollution is increasing the cost of fossil fuel. I am of the opinion that I
partially
agree
with this statement. The supporting
reasons
will be
given
in the following paragraphs.
Increasing the
price
of gasoline can be
seen
as the best solution that
possibly
improves
traffic jams and pollution for various
reasons
. The
first
and
conceivably
most obvious
reason
for this is the decreasing number of vehicles, resulting in
people
have more expenditure that
is contributed
to using public transportation. A
clear
illustration of this is that
people
who have a stable income might be impact on their daily
lifes
. Due to the fact that they are likely to
use
public transportations
instead
of private cars
because
it is cheaper than petrol
prices
. This solution brings about the fewer
carsare
used
, the less co2
are emitted
.
On the other hand
, there are convincing arguments to calm that increasing the
price
of gas is not the best way. The most
important
one is that restricted cars in each area,
especially
the heart of the city. It is more efficient and realistic due to the fact that (the) controlling gas
price
is too difficult and complicated. It, as a consequence, effects a variety of factors such as land and air transports. Last
but
not least, encouraging
people
to
use
more public transport is another
clear
reason
to consider. If
governments
campaign
effectively
, more and more
people
will using private cars
instead
.
To conclude
, although the
price
of gas
is increased
, it can solve the problems in the short term.
Therefore
, (authority and) the
government
should cooperate to figure out this problem in the long term.