Many people argue that public libraries are no longer necessary because of the development of technology. While I agree that online libraries bring various benefits for people, I would believe that it is still worth spending money on maintaining physical libraries.
One the one hand, there are two main advantages of online sources. Firstly, in the technology era, it is definitely easy and convenient for people to acquire information online whenever and wherever they want without visiting traditional libraries. This is, therefore, beneficial to those who have a busy schedule and cannot attend these places during the operating hours. Secondly, the storage of information in online sources is far greater than the public libraries. This facilitates the research needs of individual in the different aspects.
One the other hand, I would argue that those online sources can never replace public libraries’ functions. Many senior people are incapable of using technology, and thus they find it quite difficult in accessing online libraries. As a result, physical libraries are still their first choice to acquire information. Furthermore, traditional libraries can be considered a reliable source of information, compared to the online ones. The reason is that these day, information can be easily posted online without any assessment or categorize, while the sources in public libraries are frequently and carefully selected and categorized by library staff members.
In conclusion, despite the obvious advantages of online sources of information, in my opinion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that maintaining physical libraries is unnecessary.
Many
people
argue that
public
libraries are no longer necessary
because
of the development of technology. While I
agree
that
online
libraries bring various benefits for
people
, I would believe that it is
still
worth spending money on maintaining physical libraries.
One
the one hand, there are two main advantages of
online
sources
.
Firstly
, in the technology era, it is definitely easy and convenient for
people
to acquire
information
online
whenever and wherever they want without visiting traditional libraries. This is,
therefore
, beneficial to those who have a busy schedule and cannot attend these places during the operating hours.
Secondly
, the storage of
information
in
online
sources
is far greater than the
public
libraries. This facilitates the research needs of individual in the
different
aspects.
One
the other hand, I would argue that those
online
sources
can never replace
public
libraries’ functions.
Many
senior
people
are incapable of using technology, and
thus
they find it quite difficult in accessing
online
libraries.
As a result
, physical libraries are
still
their
first
choice to acquire
information
.
Furthermore
, traditional libraries can
be considered
a reliable
source
of
information
, compared to the
online
ones. The reason is that
these day
,
information
can be
easily
posted
online
without any assessment or categorize, while the
sources
in
public
libraries are
frequently
and
carefully
selected and categorized by library staff members.
In conclusion
, despite the obvious advantages of
online
sources
of
information
, in my opinion, there are sufficient grounds to reject the view that maintaining physical libraries is unnecessary.