Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In wealthier nations, governments pay a cheque of cash to those people without a job every week to manage their daily expenses.

In wealthier nations, governments pay a cheque of cash to those people without a job every week to manage their daily expenses. Wj2a

In wealthier nations, governments pay a cheque of cash to those people without a job every week to manage their daily expenses. Some people are in favour of this argument while others say that giving money to these people should be avoided. In this essay, I will consider both views and explain why I agree that giving money to jobless people should be encouraged. On the one hand, in rich countries helping the citizens is the responsibility of the governments. These authorities pay a bit of money to those who are facing difficulties in life. The reason being, government collect a huge amount of taxes from peoples when they are employed. For instance, In the UK, some percentage of money is deducted from the salary of every working individual. So, in the time of worry, they pay back so that people can afford bread and butter. These initiatives are healthy because they prevent suicidal thoughts and crimes in society. On the other hand, those who are against this notion have their own reasons. They say this kind of reward to the citizens should be saved and used in other resources like developing infrastructure of cities like hospitals and schools. Giving such benefits forces people to quit their jobs and depend on the governments. However, I don’t agree with these people because what they say is not the case with every unemployed person. There are people who are in real problems like some businesses make huge losses that they go bankrupt. Such individuals only depend on governments for moral support. To conclude, distributing money to those who are out of jobs is a good measure and it should be encouraged in every nation as it helps those who are in serious trouble and maintains the balance of society.

In wealthier nations, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 pay a Possible spelling mistake. 'cheque' is British English.check
cheque
 of cash to those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 without a job every week to manage their daily expenses. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 are in Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.favor
favour
 of this argument while others say that giving You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 to these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should be avoided
. In this essay, I will consider both views and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :interpret
explain
 why I This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 that giving You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 to jobless You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 should be encouraged
.

On the one hand, in rich countries helping the citizens is the responsibility of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
. These authorities pay a bit of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 to those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are facing difficulties in life. The reason being, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
government
 collect a huge amount of taxes from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
peoples
 when they are employed
. For instance
, In the UK, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 percentage of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
is deducted
 from the salary of every working individual. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
, in the time of worry, they pay back This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 can afford bread and butter. These initiatives are healthy This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 suicidal thoughts and crimes in society.

On the other hand
, those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are against this notion have their This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :possess
own
 reasons. They say this kind of reward to the citizens should be saved
 and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 in other resources like developing infrastructure of cities like hospitals and schools. Giving such benefits forces You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to quit their jobs and depend on the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
. However
, I don’t This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquiesce
agree
 with these You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 what they say is not the case with every unemployed person. There are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are in real problems like This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 businesses This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 huge losses that they go bankrupt. Such individuals This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 depend on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpowerministryunionauthoritystaterule
governments
 for moral support.

To conclude
, distributing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 to those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are out of jobs is a This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :beneficialproduct
good
 measure and it should be encouraged
 in every nation as it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :assists
helps
 those You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwhich
who
 are in serious trouble and maintains the balance of society. 