In time of economic crisis, in which field do you think the government can cut financial support? 1- Art2- Scientific research3- Parks and public garden. v.2
In time of economic crisis, in which field do you think the government can cut financial support? 1- Art2- Scientific research3- Parks and public garden. v. 2
Many people think that, during economic crisis the government can cut the financial support from the research and the parks and gardens. They think that the art is a valuable thing that the community cannot left behind. Although i understand their point of view, I see that during crisis the government can cut the financial support from the art but not from the research or parks and gardens because the arts it only effect few citizens, but the scientific research and the gardens are an advantage for all citizens. In addition, we can protect humans from several dangerous diseases by doing good scientific research.
First, cutting a financial support from the public parks and gardens can affect many citizens. For example, if the government cut the support from the art, few people will effect. Those who are work in this field, and few percentage of population who are going to the museum to see paintings. Cutting support from art will not affect the advancement of the country. I agree it is important but other field need more support. On the other hand, if the government cut the support from the parks and gardens, the place which many people meant it. For example in South Carolina, the government didn' t maintain the trees at the public gardens, and there was a child 3 years old playing there. As a result of poorly maintained trees a bunch of trees fell on him, And it killed him.
Next, cutting support from the scientific research will not allow the scientist to discover new treatments to dangerous disease. For example, if the scientific research prevented from the financial support, many disease will spread, and many people will die as a result of this untreated dangerous disease. On contrary, the advancement in scientific research and discover treatment for many dangerous disease protect the community and make the country a place which many other people seek to treat in it. . For example, India a country which many people from different countries meant it for the treatment because the government didn' t cut the support from scientific research as a result they know a lot about many diseases and their treatment. Moreover the governments get advantages from that, a good income from treatment will earn.
In conclusion, according to the reasons mentioned above, i believe the government can cut the financial support from the art but not from the scientific research and parks and public gardens.
Many
people
think
that, during economic crisis the
government
can
cut
the
financial
support
from the
research
and the
parks
and
gardens
. They
think
that the
art
is a valuable thing that the community cannot
left
behind. Although
i
understand their point of view, I
see
that during crisis the
government
can
cut
the
financial
support
from the
art
but
not from the
research
or
parks
and
gardens
because
the
arts
it
only
effect
few citizens,
but
the
scientific
research
and the
gardens
are an advantage for all citizens.
In addition
, we can protect humans from several
dangerous
diseases
by doing
good
scientific
research.
First
, cutting a
financial
support
from the public
parks
and
gardens
can affect
many
citizens. For
example
, if the
government
cut
the
support
from the
art
, few
people
will
effect
. Those who are work in this field, and
few percentage
of population who are going to the museum to
see
paintings. Cutting
support
from
art
will not affect the advancement of the
country
. I
agree
it is
important
but
other field need more
support
.
On the other hand
, if the
government
cut
the
support
from the
parks
and
gardens
, the place which
many
people
meant it. For
example
in South Carolina, the
government
didn&
#039; t maintain the trees at the public
gardens
, and there was a child 3 years
old
playing there.
As a result
of
poorly
maintained trees a bunch of trees
fell
on him, And it killed him.
Next
, cutting
support
from the
scientific
research
will not
allow
the scientist to discover new
treatments
to
dangerous
disease
. For
example
, if the
scientific
research
prevented
from the
financial
support
,
many
disease
will spread, and
many
people
will
die
as a result
of this untreated
dangerous
disease
. On contrary, the advancement in
scientific
research
and discover
treatment
for
many
dangerous
disease
protect the community and
make
the
country
a place which
many
other
people
seek to treat in it.
.
For
example
, India a
country
which
many
people
from
different
countries
meant it for the
treatment
because
the
government
didn&
#039; t
cut
the
support
from
scientific
research
as a result
they know a lot about
many
diseases
and their
treatment
.
Moreover
the
governments
get
advantages from that, a
good
income from
treatment
will earn.
In conclusion
, according to the reasons mentioned above,
i
believe the
government
can
cut
the
financial
support
from the
art
but
not from the
scientific
research
and
parks
and public
gardens
.
13Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
92Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
12Mistakes