Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture discussed the replacement of gasoline with ethanol.

In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture discussed the replacement of gasoline with ethanol. WyGAK
In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture discussed the replacement of gasoline with ethanol. The reading passage firmly criticize this replacement, however the lecture repudiated what stated in the reading resting upon fallacious premises and provides three counterclaims proofing that ethanol is an excellent alternative to be used instead of gasoline. Firstly, the reading argued that if we started to use ethanol largely, we would cause more environmental problems, as one of the emission of ethanol combustion is carbon dioxide which is in fact one of the greenhouses; therefore, we would trap more heat in the atmosphere. The professor contradicted this point by acknowledging that as ethanol is being produced by corns, so if we want to produce more of that fuel we would have to harvest more corn plants consequently, the corns plants would use more case carbon dioxide from air as one sources of their nutrition. Secondly, the article claimed that if we used corns for producing ethanol fuel, there would be a dramatic reduce of the amount of plants available for other uses like feeding farm animals. Notwithstanding the professor highlighted that, in the process of ethanol production some parts of the corn plant that are not eaten by animals like caws and chicken, are being used, so this two procedure will not interfere each other at all. Lastly, the reading contended that usage of ethanol is not economically convincing if the government stop subcidizing this fuel. This seem to be incorrect as explained in the lecture. The speaker articulate that in near future the demand for ethanol fuel will rise, so that factories would have to increase their production; consequently even if the government stop its taxes, the price of ethanol fuel would decrease to a high extent.
In this set of materials, both the
reading
passage and the lecture discussed the replacement of gasoline with
ethanol
. The
reading
passage
firmly
criticize this replacement,
however
the lecture repudiated what stated in the
reading
resting upon fallacious premises and provides three counterclaims proofing that
ethanol
is an excellent alternative to be
used
instead
of gasoline.

Firstly
, the
reading
argued that if we
started
to
use
ethanol
largely
, we would cause more environmental problems, as one of the emission of
ethanol
combustion is carbon dioxide which is in fact one of the greenhouses;
therefore
, we would trap more heat in the atmosphere. The professor contradicted this point by acknowledging that as
ethanol
is
being produced
by
corns
,
so
if we want to produce more of that
fuel
we would
have to
harvest more
corn
plants
consequently
, the
corns
plants
would
use
more case carbon dioxide from air as one sources of their nutrition.

Secondly
, the article claimed that if we
used
corns
for producing
ethanol
fuel
, there would be a dramatic
reduce
of the amount of
plants
available for other
uses
like feeding farm animals. Notwithstanding the professor highlighted that, in the process of
ethanol
production
some
parts of the
corn
plant
that are not eaten by animals like caws and chicken, are being
used
,
so
this two procedure will not interfere each other at all.

Lastly
, the
reading
contended that usage of
ethanol
is not
economically
convincing if the
government
stop
subcidizing
this
fuel
.
This seem
to be incorrect as
explained
in the lecture. The speaker articulate that in near future the demand for
ethanol
fuel
will rise,
so
that factories would
have to
increase their production;
consequently
even if the
government
stop
its taxes, the price of
ethanol
fuel
would decrease to a high extent.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecture discussed the replacement of gasoline with ethanol.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
297 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: