The argument proposes a conclusion by the observation of Dr. Field, which says that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather by their biological parents. But, children talk more about their parents than others adults in the village. However, according to the author, he disagrees saying that the approach is invalid and his approach would be better to understand child-rearing tradition and others cultures.
First, the conclusion of the anthropologist is not completely accurate because a study of this type cannot be concluded only by observation. It is necessary to live among this village to have better conclusions. An anthropologist, to have better arguments, need to study for months, or sometimes even years to have a valid conclusion about a civilization.
For example, an psychologist must study months and see weekly a patient to have an accurate conclusion about him.
According to the author, the interview-centered method that his team of graduate students is using in Tertia a much more accurate conclusion. Which can be immediately invalided, because, as it is explained before, a conclusion about some culture is much more profound and difficult to understand. It is essential to study months and live among the culture to truly understand how they live and what are their costumes, traditions and beliefs.
Children could be reared by the village’s civilization, because children had some activities to do outdoor. However this observation do not conclude that inside their houses, parents talk, educate their children. For instance, in Middle Age, low-income families had to put their children to work in order to help their family to survive. And this was not a excuse for them to forget about their parents and only talk about adults that they see in the streets or spend more time.
Therefore, a better study living among the Turtia population could weaken both arguments, from Dr. Karp and Dr. Field. The best way to study and really understand culture, behavior, and beliefs is living or spending much more time with people from this particular place.
The argument proposes a
conclusion
by the observation of Dr. Field, which says that
children
in
Tertia
were reared
by an entire
village
rather
by their biological
parents
.
But
,
children
talk more about their
parents
than others adults in the
village
.
However
, according to the author, he disagrees saying that the approach is invalid and his approach would be
better
to
understand
child-rearing tradition
and others
cultures.
First
, the
conclusion
of the anthropologist is not completely accurate
because
a
study
of this type cannot
be concluded
only
by observation. It is necessary to
live
among this
village
to have
better
conclusions
. An anthropologist, to have
better
arguments, need to
study
for months, or
sometimes
even years to have a valid
conclusion
about a civilization.
For example
,
an
psychologist
must
study
months and
see
weekly a patient to have an accurate
conclusion
about him.
According to the author, the interview-centered method that his team of graduate students is using in
Tertia
a much more accurate
conclusion
. Which can be immediately invalided,
because
, as it is
explained
before
, a
conclusion
about
some
culture is much more profound and difficult to
understand
. It is essential to
study
months and
live
among the culture to
truly
understand
how they
live
and what are their costumes, traditions and beliefs.
Children could
be reared
by the
village’s
civilization,
because
children
had
some
activities to do outdoor.
However
this observation do not conclude that inside their
houses
,
parents
talk, educate their
children
.
For instance
, in Middle Age, low-income families had to put their
children
to work in order to
help
their family to survive. And this was not
a
excuse for them to forget about their
parents
and
only
talk about adults that they
see
in the streets or spend more time.
Therefore
, a
better
study
living among the
Turtia
population could weaken both arguments, from Dr.
Karp
and Dr. Field. The best way to
study
and
really
understand
culture, behavior, and beliefs is living or spending much more time with
people
from this particular place.