Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sending people on an asteroid would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea.

In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sending people on an asteroid would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. oRDD9
In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sending people on an asteroid would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. On the other hand, the lecturer mentions that arguments made in the reading are dubious and unpractical, and gainsays each of them. First and foremost, the reading begins by asserting that asteroid low gravity provides the favorable circumstances for landing and taking off as spacecraft would not be repelled forcefully. On the other hand, the lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that no doubt low gravitational pull is helpful for landing and taking off, but it would cause serious health risks to space crafts. To be more specific, low gravity would result in the loss of muscle mass and bone density, which are deleterious for long term stay on asteroid. Furthermore, the lecture mentions that there is no guarantee that metals found on asteroids would keep the high monetary value. He explained that because of the saturation in the market and high supply of metal, it could be possible that the market price of metal would be reduced. Furthermore, the cost of transporting that metal would be extremely high, therefore mining would not get any benefit. These claims refute the writer's implication that mining on the asteroid would result in access to the valuable and precious metals, that would be pretty profitable. Ultimately, the writer wraps its arguments by declaring that these asteroids are located closer to the earth therefore, it could be easy to reach them and land on them, unlike Mars. Not surprisingly, the speaker takes an issue with it by contending that though it is easy to reach on asteroids, it would be arduous to return. To be more clear, he explains that asteroids are closer to the earth's orbit at one point, but because of their revolution sometimes they go as far as Mars, or even farthest. Hence, this would not be a realistic approAch.
In this set of material, the writer
strongly
postulates that sending
people
on an
asteroid
would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its
idea
.
On the other hand
, the lecturer mentions that arguments made in the reading are dubious and unpractical, and gainsays each of them.

First
and foremost, the reading
begins
by asserting that
asteroid
low gravity provides the favorable circumstances for landing and taking off as spacecraft would not
be repelled
forcefully
.
On the other hand
, the lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that no doubt low gravitational pull is helpful for landing and taking off,
but
it would cause serious health
risks to space
crafts. To be more specific, low gravity would result in the loss of muscle mass and bone density, which are deleterious for long term stay on asteroid.

Furthermore
, the lecture mentions that there is no guarantee that
metals
found on
asteroids
would
keep
the high monetary value. He
explained
that
because
of the saturation in the market and high supply of
metal
, it could be possible that the market price of
metal
would be
reduced
.
Furthermore
, the cost of transporting that
metal
would be
extremely
high,
therefore
mining would not
get
any benefit. These claims refute the writer's implication that mining on the
asteroid
would result in access to the valuable and precious
metals
, that would be pretty profitable.

Ultimately
, the writer wraps its arguments by declaring that these
asteroids
are located
closer to the earth
therefore
, it could be easy to reach them and land on them, unlike Mars. Not
surprisingly
, the speaker takes an issue with it by contending that though it is easy to reach on
asteroids
, it would be arduous to return. To be more
clear
, he
explains
that
asteroids
are closer to the earth's orbit at one point,
but
because
of their revolution
sometimes
they go as far as Mars, or even farthest.
Hence
, this would not be a realistic
approAch
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that sending people on an asteroid would be a successful colonization option, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
329 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: