In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that franchising is of paramount importance for people who want to have their own business, and provides three advantages to endorse its idea. On the other hand, the lecturer states that the reasons provided in the article are questionable and dubious, and gainsays each of its arguments from the article.
First and foremost, the reading begins by asserting that franchising provides business owners with an opportunity to get reliable suppliers and prevent them from losses. The lecturer refutes this claim by insisting that a franchise company, in reality, forces the owners to buy the goods and services from their suppliers. On the other hand, independent companies can get equivalent services at much cheaper prices, but companies associated with the franchise cannot buy those services independently and have to buy expensive suppliers' services.
Furthermore, he mentions the fact that franchised company has to give 6% of sum total salary to an established company, then in return, they get an advertisement. Moreover, those advertisements are not alone for a single owner's company, many other businesses and stores get benefits too and, an established company is basically advertising its own brand or name. These claims clearly refute the writer's implication that franchising provides companies with the opportunity for advertisement.
Ultimately, the writer wraps its arguments by stating that franchising gives security to businesses as they reduced the risk proportions. Not surprisingly, the lecturer rebates this claim by contending that companies could reduce the risks but do not provide security. To be more specific, the reading did not talk about another important aspect which businesses owner can get benefit from. That is buying businesses from already existing independent owners, who really want to sell their businesses. If owners buy such businesses it would be much more successful and profitable.
In this set of material, the writer
strongly
postulates that
franchising
is of paramount importance for
people
who want to have their
own
business
, and
provides
three advantages to endorse its
idea
.
On the other hand
, the lecturer states that the reasons provided in the article are questionable and dubious, and gainsays each of its arguments from the article.
First
and foremost, the reading
begins
by asserting that
franchising
provides
business
owners
with an opportunity to
get
reliable suppliers and
prevent
them from losses. The lecturer refutes this claim by insisting that a franchise
company
, in reality, forces the
owners
to
buy
the
goods
and services from their suppliers.
On the other hand
, independent
companies
can
get
equivalent services at much cheaper prices,
but
companies
associated with the franchise cannot
buy
those services
independently
and
have to
buy
expensive suppliers' services.
Furthermore
, he mentions the fact that franchised
company
has to
give 6% of sum total salary to an established
company
, then in return, they
get
an advertisement.
Moreover
, those advertisements are not alone for a single owner's
company
,
many
other
businesses
and stores
get
benefits too and, an established
company
is
basically
advertising its
own
brand or name. These claims
clearly
refute the writer's implication that
franchising
provides
companies
with the opportunity for advertisement.
Ultimately
, the writer wraps its arguments by stating that
franchising
gives security to
businesses
as they
reduced
the
risk
proportions. Not
surprisingly
, the lecturer rebates this claim by contending that
companies
could
reduce
the
risks
but
do not
provide
security. To be more specific, the reading did not talk about another
important
aspect which
businesses
owner
can
get
benefit from.
That is
buying
businesses
from already existing independent
owners
, who
really
want to sell their
businesses
. If
owners
buy
such
businesses
it would be much more successful and profitable.