Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that imposing a high tax on cigarettes and other unhealthy products would lead to several advantages for society, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea.

In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that imposing a high tax on cigarettes and other unhealthy products would lead to several advantages for society, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. XG33A
In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that imposing a high tax on cigarettes and other unhealthy products would lead to several advantages for society, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea. The lecturer on the other hand mentions that each argument made in listening is dubious and impractical, and gainsays each argument from the reading. First and foremost, the reading begins by asserting that raising taxes would help people to prevent developing unhealthy habits. This is because when cigarettes are made costly fewer people will buy them. The lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that increasing the tax on cigarettes will encourage people to buy cheaper cigarettes and similar products that are far more dangerous for public health. Moreover, when people spend their money on costly cigarettes, smokers would not have enough money left to buy healthy food options. That prone healthy risks to them. Furthermore, the speaker mentions that there are other ways to make fair policies but this taxing policy is fairly injustice considering the monthly income of the individuals. To be more specific, there are high earning and low earning people in a society. It might not be arduous for a high income earning person to pay high cigarette tax, but it will add up the financial burden for a low earning smoker. These claims refute the writer's implication that taxes are financially fair as it would apply to those who smoke, and not other individuals of society have to contribute. Lastly, the writer wraps up the arguments by declaring that taxation increases the revenue for the government which they can use for the development of the society. Not surprisingly, the lecturer takes issue with it by contending that the downside of this revenue would be that government would become too dependent on that. Not only the revenue of million dollars will lure the authorities not to implement fines on smokers, but also prohibit them to adopt radical measures such as policies for public and outdoor smoking
In this set of material, the writer
strongly
postulates that imposing a
high
tax
on
cigarettes
and
other
unhealthy products would lead to several advantages for
society
, and provides three reasons to endorse its
idea
. The lecturer on the
other
hand mentions that each argument made in listening is dubious and impractical, and gainsays each argument from the reading.

First
and foremost, the reading
begins
by asserting that raising
taxes
would
help
people
to
prevent
developing unhealthy habits. This is
because
when
cigarettes
are made
costly fewer
people
will
buy
them. The lecturer refutes this claim by pointing out that increasing the
tax
on
cigarettes
will encourage
people
to
buy
cheaper
cigarettes
and similar products that are far more
dangerous
for public health.
Moreover
, when
people
spend their money on costly
cigarettes
, smokers would not have
enough
money
left
to
buy
healthy food options. That prone healthy
risks
to them.

Furthermore
, the speaker mentions that there are
other
ways to
make
fair
policies
but
this taxing policy is
fairly
injustice considering the monthly income of the individuals. To be more specific, there are
high
earning
and low
earning
people
in a
society
. It might not be arduous for a
high
income
earning
person to pay
high
cigarette
tax
,
but
it will
add
up the financial burden for a low
earning
smoker. These claims refute the writer's implication that
taxes
are
financially
fair
as it would apply to those who smoke, and not
other
individuals of
society
have to
contribute.

Lastly
, the writer wraps up the arguments by declaring that taxation increases the revenue for the
government
which they can
use
for the development of the
society
. Not
surprisingly
, the lecturer takes issue with it by contending that the downside of this revenue would be that
government
would become too dependent on that. Not
only
the revenue of million dollars will lure the authorities not to implement fines on smokers,
but
also
prohibit them to adopt radical measures such as policies for public and outdoor
smoking

IELTS essay In this set of material, the writer strongly postulates that imposing a high tax on cigarettes and other unhealthy products would lead to several advantages for society, and provides three reasons to endorse its idea.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
334 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: