On the one hand, the young generation has more power, creativity, and dynamism which are beneficial to progress and activities in some cases. In fact, these mentioned items are basic foundations for developing and achieving economic and artistic aims, in which, always youth are better than old people. For example, in industrial cases like working in factories which are needful extra physical factors or the case of art, that the first and foremost point is creativity, the countries with a large number of young adults are more successful. Also, due to the fact that olds have lots of health problems and need significant health care and facilities like hospitals, governments in the countries with the majority of young, are able to set the added budget for other factors Instead of health issues of olds.
On the other hand, finding a job position is hard in countries with a large number of youth, as well as, this disadvantage left a significant negative impact on society. In the other words, unemployment of a big group of the nation will be caused to increase the crime and mental problems. For instance, Iran which has many 20-35 years people, has very challenges in financial items and mental among this generation because of joblessness. In addition, the elderly are the inheritors of culture and history, so without them, it is tough that we save our heritage and origins. Although, governments could plan and organize these subjects with economic experts' help and also document the history.
In conclusion, I believe that the positive effects in countries with more young people are key points for progressing and developing in cases like economy or art and with fewer elders, authorities have extra chances for development in more fields.
On the one hand, the
young
generation has more power, creativity, and dynamism which are beneficial to progress and activities in
some
cases. In fact, these mentioned items are basic foundations for developing and achieving economic and artistic aims, in which, always youth are better than
old
people
.
For example
, in industrial cases like working in factories which are needful extra physical factors or the case of art, that the
first
and foremost point is creativity, the
countries
with
a large number of
young
adults are more successful.
Also
, due to the fact that olds have lots of health problems and need significant health care and facilities like hospitals,
governments
in the
countries
with the majority of
young
, are able to set the
added
budget for other factors
Instead
of health issues of olds.
On the other hand
, finding a job position is
hard
in
countries
with
a large number of
youth,
as well
as, this disadvantage
left
a significant
negative
impact on society. In the other words, unemployment of a
big
group of the nation will
be caused
to increase the crime and mental problems.
For instance
, Iran which has
many
20-35 years
people
, has
very
challenges in financial items and mental among this generation
because
of joblessness.
In addition
, the elderly are the inheritors of culture and history,
so
without them, it is tough that we save our heritage and origins. Although,
governments
could plan and organize these subjects with economic experts'
help
and
also
document the history.
In conclusion
, I believe that the
positive
effects in
countries
with more
young
people
are key points for progressing and developing in cases like economy or art and with fewer elders, authorities have extra chances for development in more fields.