Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.

In the modern world it is no longer necessary to use animals for food, clothing or medicine. o0Ww

Animals are just another wonderful creation of gods, just like humans. Some of them live in wilds and some are domesticated by humans. However, some animals are hunted down for commercial purposes. It is an activity which in my view, is no longer needed in modern world. In my essay, I will be providing some reasons for this. Firstly, killing and using them for variety of purposes, shakes the whole food cycle, set up by the mother nature. People need to realize that every animal plays a pivotal role in the environment. Their absence in food chain, could seriously harm the environment, the same environment in which humans live. For example, tigers are known to hunt boars, which are responsible for destructing food crops. If tigers are made extinct, then population of boars will increase which then will affect the food crop supplies. Secondly, every nutrient like proteins, vitamins and minerals are available in raw form and can be extracted from variety of plant species, which were earlier extracted from animal’s bones and muscles. This can be proven from various ancient texts, which clearly mentions usage of various herbal plants that were used to suffice the nutrients intake of human body. So there is no need to kill animals for food or to produce medicines. In contrast, there could be some economic effect, if animal’s commercial usage is banned. Some nations, like India, are the largest exporter of beef in the world, supplying nearly 20% to the world. The country’s economy is hugely dependent on this activity. Stopping it would shake the country’s economy. Moreover, people employed in slaughter houses or clothing industry will face the aftermath of this decision. To sum up, animal usage for food, clothing and medicines should be stopped as it is affecting the environment most. However, countries will face some economic impact, which countries can recover by opting different strategies. So in my view, in present scenario, there is no need to kill animals for variety of usage.

You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
Animals
 are This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 another wonderful creation of gods, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 like You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 of them This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
 in wilds and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
are domesticated
 by You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
. However
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
are hunted
 down for commercial purposes. It is an activity which in my view, is no longer needed in modern world. In my essay, I will be providing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 reasons for this.

Firstly
, killing and using them for variety of purposes, shakes the whole You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 cycle, set up by the mother nature. This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
People
 need to realize that every You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
 plays a pivotal role in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
. Their absence in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 chain, could seriously
 harm the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
, the same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 in which You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbodylifemortalcharacterindividualchild
humans
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reside
live
. For example
, tigers are known
 to hunt boars, which are responsible for destructing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 crops. If tigers are made
 extinct, then population of boars will increase which then will affect the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 crop supplies.

Secondly
, every nutrient like proteins, vitamins and minerals are available in raw form and can be extracted
 from variety of plant species, which were earlier extracted from You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal’s
 bones and muscles. This can be proven
 from various ancient texts, which clearly
 mentions You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 of various herbal plants that were This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 to suffice the Apostrophe might be missing. Did you mean "nutrients'" or "nutrient's"?nutrients'nutrient's
nutrients
 intake of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpersonalanimalmortal
human
 body. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 there is no need to kill You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
 or to produce medicines.

In contrast
, there could be This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 economic effect, if You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal’s
 commercial You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
is banned
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
Some
 nations, like India, are the largest exporter of beef in the world, supplying nearly
 20% to the world. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country’s
 economy is hugely
 dependent on this activity. Stopping it would shake the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withrusticbucolichomeyagrarianprovincial
country’s
 economy. Moreover
, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 employed in slaughter This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residences
houses
 or clothing industry will face the aftermath of this decision.

To sum up, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnaturalbodily
animal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeedcuisinesnackmeatdrinkfoodstuff
food
, clothing and medicines should be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :terminateceaseddiscontinued
stopped
 as it is affecting the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstatusclimatehabitatsurroundingssettingsituation
environment
 most. However
, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 will face This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 economic impact, which You use this word too often, consider replacing it withlandpeopleregioncommunitysocietystate
countries
 can recover by opting This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 strategies. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
So
 in my view, in present scenario, there is no need to kill You use this word too often, consider replacing it withpetbeastcreature
animals
 for variety of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmanagement
usage
. 