Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

in the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will able to read everything they want online without paying. to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the near future, buying traditional newspapers and paper-based books will be disappear since people will be able to access to free online resources. This idea seems to be proved correct on account of the reducing environmental problems in addition to the ability to access to resources anywhere and anytime. One major drive of the practicality of such a notion would be that using digital content would avoid polluting and destroying the ecosystem. This is not to say that such modern methods neutralize the role of paper references and materials, but paper companies to respond to high demand for new content, need to escalate their products so it would damage the environment. This phenomenon, might encourage people to diminish dependence on paper products. This action, accordingly, could minimize the risk of Environmental damage. A second rationale behind the success of the theory of the users as long as they are connected to the internet they could access to great deal of digital newspapers or electronic books, on the one hand, people are informed of the news of day at a frantic pace, thanks to the high-end technologies. This measure, albeit not eliminating importance of paper-based books, gradually make digital information more popular. This innovation hence, would lead people to use online content. In the light of the above-mentioned analysis, with regard to the question of whether daily papers can supplant by online content or not, this exchange of view appears to be confirmed due to minimize damage to the environment as well as potentiality of access to resources anywhere and anytime.

In the near future, buying traditional newspapers and paper-based books will be Consider using the past participle “disappeared”.disappeared
disappear
 since You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 will be able to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentryconnectionapproach
access
 to free online resources. This This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :thoughtconceptnotion
idea
 seems to be proved
 correct on account of the reducing environmental problems in addition
 to the ability to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentryconnectionapproach
access
 to resources anywhere and anytime.

One major drive of the practicality of such a notion would be that using digital content would avoid polluting and destroying the ecosystem. This is not to say that such modern methods neutralize the role of paper references and materials, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 paper This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :enterprisescorporations
companies
 to respond to high demand for new content, need to escalate their products This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 it would damage the environment. This phenomenon, might encourage You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to diminish dependence on paper products. Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Consider rewording the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
This
 action, accordingly
, could minimize the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazarddanger
risk
 of Environmental damage.

A second rationale behind the success of the theory of the users as long as they are connected
 to the internet they could You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentryconnectionapproach
access
 to great deal of digital newspapers or electronic books, on the one hand, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
are informed
 of the news of day at a frantic pace, thanks to the high-This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :expiration
end
 technologies. This measure, albeit not eliminating importance of paper-based books, gradually
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createconstructmanufactureproduce
make
 digital information more popular. This innovation hence
, would lead You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcrowdfamilycommunitynationsocietypublic
people
 to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 online content.

In the light of the above-mentioned analysis, with regard to Wordiness: Consider shortening this phrase.whetherthe question whether
the question of whether
 daily papers can supplant by online content or not, this exchange of view appears to be confirmed
 due to minimize damage to the environment as well
 as potentiality of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withentryconnectionapproach
access
 to resources anywhere and anytime. 