In many countries, there is a communication rift between the older and younger generations. This is a natural phenomenon and the solution is for both sides to compromise.
The old and young often cannot communicate well because of major differences in perspective. It is natural that older people will have a more mature outlook and younger people be more radical in their views. A good example of this would be in Vietnam where the older generation holds very conservative, traditional views related to familial structures, careers, and social values that conflict with the more modern, progressive positions of the younger generation. Young people have heard the traditional arguments for years and want to rebel, often out of naivety. Older people have the benefit of experience and and feel young people should follow their advice. This basic antagonism underlies poor communication between the generations.
The best solutions all rely on compromise. Young people ought to accept that their lack of life experience puts them at a disadvantage in understanding the world. Many of their opinions are premature and will evolve over time. This implies that they should make greater efforts to understand the counsel of their elders. Their elders, in turn, must realise that their experiences are a small sample size from a unique time period. If, for example, they had to struggle to earn a living and raise a family, they must concede this only a single instance that cannot be simplistically generalised. Moreover, times have changed and what was sound advice in the past, may be largely irrelevant today.
In conclusion, the old and young are in different life stages and naturally have contrasting mindsets and the best solutions require a self-reflective modesty from both demographics. In this way, they will be able to learn more from each other
In  
many
 countries, there is a communication rift between the  
older
 and younger generations. This is a natural phenomenon and the solution is for both sides to compromise.
The  
old
 and  
young
  often
 cannot communicate well  
because
 of major differences in perspective. It is natural that  
older
  people
 will have a more mature outlook and younger  
people
 be more radical in their views. A  
good
 example of this would be in Vietnam where the  
older
 generation holds  
very
 conservative, traditional views related to familial structures, careers, and social values that conflict with the more modern, progressive positions of the younger generation.  
Young
  people
 have heard the traditional arguments for years and want to rebel,  
often
 out of naivety.  
Older
  people
 have the benefit of experience  
and and
 feel  
young
  people
 should follow their advice. This basic antagonism underlies poor communication between the generations.
The best solutions all rely on compromise.  
Young
  people
 ought to accept that their lack of life experience puts them at a disadvantage in understanding the world.  
Many
 of their opinions are premature and will evolve over time.  
This implies that
 they should  
make
 greater efforts to understand the counsel of their elders. Their elders, in turn,  
must
  realise
 that their experiences are a  
small
 sample size from a unique time period. If,  
for example
, they had to struggle to earn a living and raise a family, they  
must
 concede this  
only
 a single instance that cannot be  
simplistically
  generalised
.  
Moreover
, times have  
changed
 and what was sound advice in the past, may be  
largely
 irrelevant  
today
. 
In conclusion
, the  
old
 and  
young
 are in  
different
 life stages and  
naturally
 have contrasting mindsets and the best solutions require a self-reflective modesty from both demographics. In this way, they will be able to learn more from each  
other