Regarding rural communities, two points of sufferance come into place: education and health. Some government officials propose mandating teacher and doctor service to rural towns; however, this proposal faces serious opposition. This essay sides with this forced work requirement but will address points supporting and opposing teacher and doctor assignment to countryside villages.
The more favorable argument rests with requiring teachers and doctors to provide years of service to remote communities. Developing countries increasingly face domestic immigration from rural residents who flee to major cities searching for better health and education lacking in their villages, thereby multiplying overcrowding, pollution, and overtaxing city schools. This essay posits that this problem outweighs any argument against a force work mandate since teachers' and doctors' placement in rural regions will motivate rural residents to stay in their communities and reduce major city problems. Another reason this author favors doctor and teacher forced countryside service relates to the resulting increased living standards. With the influx of established schools accompanying businesses and restaurants develop, increased health care will allow local men and women to improve their work productivity, thereby increasing their living standards.
Yes, the stronger argument sides with the work mandate, but arguments do exist opposite this position. To start, some would argue that forcing medical professionals and educational leaders to work in distant communities will result in a negative performance. This argument, opposed by this author, centers on the individual psychologically disengaging from their work since they are unhappy, thereby providing substandard service. Be that as it may, opponents to forced location working will point to the right to work that should take precedence in a democratic society. This argument believes that unless mandated through some scholarship, doctors, and teachers hold the absolute right to choose their work location, just like any other profession. Despite the nature of the above arguments, this essay strongly disagrees and supports insisting on rural relocation since doctor and teacher services serve a greater societal need.
Governments face and propose solutions to societal problems such as education and health, and one suggestion would place doctors and teachers in rural communities. This essay details both favoring and opposing this position, but as stated above, the proper position would support government mandates to service the outlying districts.
Regarding
rural
communities
, two points of sufferance
come
into place: education and
health
.
Some
government
officials propose mandating
teacher
and
doctor
service
to
rural
towns;
however
, this proposal faces serious opposition. This
essay
sides with this forced
work
requirement
but
will address points supporting and opposing
teacher
and
doctor
assignment to countryside villages.
The more favorable
argument
rests with requiring
teachers
and
doctors
to provide years of
service
to remote
communities
.
Developing countries
increasingly
face domestic immigration from
rural
residents who flee to major cities searching for better
health
and education lacking in their villages, thereby multiplying overcrowding, pollution, and overtaxing city schools. This
essay
posits that this problem outweighs any
argument
against a force
work
mandate since teachers' and doctors' placement in
rural
regions will motivate
rural
residents to stay in their
communities
and
reduce
major city problems. Another reason this author favors
doctor
and
teacher
forced countryside
service
relates to the resulting increased living standards. With the influx of established schools accompanying businesses and restaurants develop, increased
health
care will
allow
local
men
and women to
improve
their
work
productivity, thereby increasing their living standards.
Yes, the stronger
argument
sides with the
work
mandate,
but
arguments
do exist opposite this position. To
start
,
some
would argue that forcing medical professionals and educational leaders to
work
in distant
communities
will result in a
negative
performance. This
argument
, opposed by this author, centers on the individual
psychologically
disengaging from their
work
since they are unhappy, thereby providing substandard
service
. Be that as it may, opponents to forced location working will point to the right to
work
that should take precedence in a democratic society. This
argument
believes that unless mandated through
some
scholarship,
doctors
, and
teachers
hold the absolute right to choose their
work
location,
just
like any other profession. Despite the nature of the above
arguments
, this
essay
strongly
disagrees and supports insisting on
rural
relocation since
doctor
and
teacher
services
serve a greater societal need.
Governments
face and propose solutions to societal problems such as education and
health
, and one suggestion would place
doctors
and
teachers
in
rural
communities
. This
essay
details
both favoring and opposing this position,
but
as stated above, the proper position would support
government
mandates to
service
the outlying districts.