Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In some countries, governments pay unemployed people on a weekly basis. How would this impact people as well as the government? Do you agree or disagree with that?

In some countries, governments pay unemployed people on a weekly basis. How would this impact people as well as the government? with that? dqDq2
This essay would discuss the topic “the government’s paying weekly to the unemployed” and I disagree with it since there are chances for the unemployed to get lazy and miss the actual opportunities available and could degrade the caliber of the skilled. Also, it is not necessary to give money as a favour but the government can compensate with other benefits like health insurance, houses for free or with minimal rent, etc. . Instead of the government paying weekly to the unemployed, they should focus more on increasing the employment as it will reduce the unemployment which is the major problem for numerous issues and crimes in the country. Since, there is no shortage for skilled people but there is a definite short fall of literacy rate, the government can also assist/help the unemployed to attain certifications of their interest or skills which would eventually make them eligible for more opportunities. Even though this scheme has its own benefits to the economically backward families who are more in number, it also has its backdrops as mentioned earlier. This essay has argued about “the government’s paying weekly to the unemployed” and my opinion would be to help the unemployed with jobs instead of money which could result in productive output.
This essay would discuss the topic “the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government’s
paying weekly to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed”
and I disagree with it since there are chances for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
lazy and miss the actual opportunities available and could degrade the caliber of the skilled.
Also
, it is not necessary to give money as a
Possible spelling mistake. 'favour' is British English.
favour
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can compensate with other benefits like health insurance,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
for free or with minimal rent, etc.
Two consecutive dots
.


Instead
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
paying weekly to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed
, they should focus more on increasing the employment as it will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
the unemployment which is the major problem for numerous issues and crimes in the country. Since, there is no shortage for skilled
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
definite
short fall of literacy rate, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
can
also
assist/
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed
to attain certifications of their interest or
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
skills
which would
eventually
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
them eligible for more opportunities.

Even though
this scheme has its
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
benefits to the
economically
backward families who are more in number, it
also
has its backdrops as mentioned earlier.

This essay has argued about “the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government’s
paying weekly to the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed”
and my opinion would be to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
help
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
unemployed
with jobs
instead
of money which could result in productive output.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay In some countries, governments pay unemployed people on a weekly basis. How would this impact people as well as the government? with that?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
209 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts