Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

In some countries celebrities complain about the way media publicize their private lives. Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame . Do you agree or disagree?

In some countries celebrities complain about the way media publicize their private lives. Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame. mxOA

I disagree with the view that celebrities have to accept the manner in which their private lives are I disagree with the view that celebrities have to accept the manner in which their private lives are made public by the media. It is undeniable that they are in the spotlight and want to be popular by choice. However, their rights to privacy need to be protected as well, as they too are humans. I shall put forth my arguments in this essay. To commence with, celebrities are already under a lot of pressure to perform well, as they are public figures and are always in the public eye. Be it a politician, a sportsperson, a singer or an actor, all these professions require them to be at their best at all times. This stress of someone constantly following them affects the way they perform, which ultimately leads to a loss for the masses. Secondly, these celebs are role models for the people. When any negative side of their private life is exposed, their followers think it glamorous to do the same, which is definitely detrimental for the society as a whole. For example, if people come to know that the celeb they adore, smokes and drinks in private life, they think there is nothing wrong in doing so and also copy their idol. This is where responsible journalism is needed. Undoubtedly, the celebrities choose this life for the name and fame and to be in the spotlight. Without the media, the term celebrity will not hold any meaning. However, that doesn’t mean that the media and paparazzi have a right to stalk them at all times. To add to it, sensationalizing the news in order for the channel to get more TRP is unethical. Responsible journalism and some ethics need to be followed by those who get the news to the masses, as they may adversely affect someone’s personal and professional lives. Who doesn’t remember the unfortunate incident when the world lost a very eminent public figure, Lady Diana? That accident happened because the paparazzi were chasing the car she was travelling in. It is something which could have been easily avoided, had the paparazzi been a little rational in their behavior. To sum up, it can be reiterated that responsible journalism means knowing its limits. Celebs too have their private lives and they have a right to privacy. The media has to be judicious in knowing what to report and how much to report, and should never misuse its power.

I disagree with the view that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonefigureluminarypersonageherostar
celebrities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 accept the manner in which their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withindependentconfidentialseparatesecretindividualexclusive
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
 are I disagree with the view that You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonefigureluminarypersonageherostar
celebrities
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:ought to
have to
 accept the manner in which their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withindependentconfidentialseparatesecretindividualexclusive
private
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
are made
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 by the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
. It is undeniable that they are in the spotlight and want to be popular by choice. However
, their rights to privacy need to be protected
as well
, as they too are humans. I shall put forth my arguments in this essay.

To commence with, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonefigureluminarypersonageherostar
celebrities
 are already under This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a plethora ofa number ofnumerous
a lot of
 pressure to perform well, as they are You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 figures and are always in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 eye. Be it a politician, a sportsperson, a singer or an actor, all these professions require them to be at their best at all times. This This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accentuate
stress
 of someone constantly
 following them affects the way they perform, which ultimately
 leads to a loss for the masses.

Secondly
, these celebs are role models for the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
. When any This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:adverse
negative
 side of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withindependentconfidentialseparatesecretindividualexclusive
private
 life is exposed
, their followers This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 it glamorous to do the same, which is definitely detrimental for the society as a whole. For example
, if This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :approacharrive
come
 to know that the celeb they adore, smokes and drinks in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withindependentconfidentialseparatesecretindividualexclusive
private
 life, they This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :reckonassumebelieveconsider
think
 there is nothing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:incorrect
wrong
 in doing This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 and also
 copy their idol. This is where responsible journalism is needed
.

Undoubtedly
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonefigureluminarypersonageherostar
celebrities
 choose this life for the name and fame and to be in the spotlight. Without the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
, the term You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsomeonefigureluminarypersonageherostar
celebrity
 will not hold any meaning. However
, that doesn’t mean that the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
 and paparazzi have a right to stalk them at all times. To This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accrue
add
 to it, sensationalizing the news in order for the channel to This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 more TRP is unethical. Responsible journalism and This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 ethics need to be followed
 by those who This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :acquire
get
 the news to the masses, as they may adversely
 affect someone’s personal and professional You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
lives
. Who doesn’t remember the unfortunate incident when the world lost a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:extremelyimmenselysupremelysuperb
very
 eminent You use this word too often, consider replacing it withurbanmutualciviccivilnationalcommunal
public
 figure, Lady Diana? That accident happened This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 the paparazzi were chasing the car she was travelling in. It is something which could have been easily
 avoided, had the paparazzi been a This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:tiny
little
 rational in their behavior.

To sum up, it can be reiterated
 that responsible journalism means knowing its limits. Celebs Did you mean "to have"?to have
too have
 their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withindependentconfidentialseparatesecretindividualexclusive
private
Use a comma before 'and' if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).lives, and
lives and
 they have a right to privacy. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withnewstelevisionradiopublishing
media
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:oughts to
has to
 be judicious in knowing what to report and how much to report, and should never misuse its power. 