Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

• In some cities people can build and design homes and office buildings however they like. This is preferable to having strict controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

• In some cities people can build and design homes and office buildings however they like. This is preferable to having strict controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. rPRL
People in several cities construct and customise their places of work and residence according to their preference. However, some criticise this tendency and argue in support of stringent regulation over these types of customised establishments. The benefits of implementing personal styles on one’s building might have significant value, though the setbacks regarding it, in my opinion, have eclipsed all its advantages. This essay will elucidate on it. On one hand, as the government gives an absolute authority to the owners to implement personalised architecture and design on their establishments, individuals use their own creativeness and innovations into it. This improves the aesthetic beauty of a locality. For instance, in an Italian city, Venice, residents have designed houses and hotels in bright colours, which look magnificent in the daylight and eventually attract innumerable tourists. Consequently, it would not only fetch revenue for the government, but also become a source of income for the people. Furthermore, it also reduces the burden of the government from allocating substantial amount of the budget on the construction of standardised commercial and residential places. On the other hand, unorganised constructions may lead to disastrous consequences in times of natural calamities such as an earthquake or a tsunami, to name a few. It does not only lead to massive destruction of property, but might also be life threatening for the inhabitants. Moreover, it would become difficult to provide relief facilities to people in need. To cite an example, in the year 2015 a number of unplanned cities in Nepal were ruined by an unforeseen strong earthquake that destroyed all the properties and took away many lives. In conclusion, I firmly opine that, although personalisation of homes and offices has been proven to be helpful for both, the government and the individual owners, certain intervention of government is required in disaster prone areas.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
in several cities construct and
Possible spelling mistake. 'customise' is British English.
customise
their places of work and residence according to their preference.
However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
Possible spelling mistake. 'criticise' is British English.
criticise
this tendency and argue in support of stringent regulation over these types of
Possible spelling mistake. 'customised' is British English.
customised
establishments. The benefits of implementing personal styles on one’s building might have significant value, though the setbacks regarding it, in my opinion, have eclipsed all its advantages. This essay will elucidate on it.

On one hand, as the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
gives an absolute authority to the owners to implement
Possible spelling mistake. 'personalised' is British English.
personalised
architecture and design on their establishments, individuals
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
their
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
own
creativeness and innovations into it. This
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improves
the aesthetic beauty of a locality.
For instance
, in an Italian city, Venice, residents have designed
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
and hotels in bright
Possible spelling mistake. 'colours' is British English.
colours
, which look magnificent in the daylight and
eventually
attract innumerable tourists.
Consequently
, it would not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
fetch revenue for the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
become a source of income for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
.
Furthermore
, it
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduces
the burden of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
from allocating substantial amount of the budget on the construction of
Possible spelling mistake. 'standardised' is British English.
standardised
commercial and residential places.

On the other hand
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
unorganised
constructions may lead to disastrous consequences in times of natural calamities such as an earthquake or a tsunami, to name a few. It does not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
lead to massive destruction of property,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
might
also
be life threatening for the inhabitants.
Moreover
, it would become difficult to provide relief facilities to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in need. To cite an example, in the year 2015 a number of unplanned cities in Nepal
were ruined
by an unforeseen strong earthquake that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
destroyed
all the properties and took away
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lives
.

In conclusion
, I
firmly
opine that, although
Possible spelling mistake found.
personalisation
of homes and offices has
been proven
to be helpful for both, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
and the individual owners, certain intervention of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
government
is required
in disaster prone areas.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay • In some cities people can build and design homes and office buildings however they like. This is preferable to having strict controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
305 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • • In some cities people can build and design homes and office buildings however they like. This is preferable to having strict controls over the design and construction of housing and office buildings. To what extent do you agree or disagree?