Does curfew will prevent young people from becoming either perpetrators or victims of nighttime crime? In recent times curfew have been imposed is some states from the US, this means that under no circunstances are teenagers allowed to be in streets after certain time at night, there is no doubt in my mind that imposing curfew have its positive consequences but at the same time there are some negative points that need to be mentioned.
Firstly, although imposing curfew have their possitive consequences such as preventing teenagers from being robbed, kidnapped or getting drugs and so forth in easy way there is no guarantee that all these risks could be avoided, it should no be forgotten that a large number of crimes are commited during the day, young people can get drugs at school easily and kidnappers do not hesitate when they have an opportunity whatever hour. For instance, in past years there have sadly been some gun shoots at schools and those attacks were during morning hours. Unfortunately, those incidents can not be prevented with curfew.
Secondly, if in all cities time limit were impossed to teenagers they would started to live with fear regardless if their city was secure or not. For example, recent survey indicates that the a large number of teenager are feeling more insecure than before due to the fact that they tend to believed that they are living like a movie story where no one can leave their houses after 10: 00pm because there some extrange creatures looking for people to eat and they tend to believe that protection is needed, a gun or something that can be useful for fight against those creatures. Hence, this is a huge disadvantage because teenagers are tought to be protected and consequently they believe that need a gun.
To sum up, on balance I tend to believe that where time limit is impossed teenagers could no get drugs or could be robbed easily but in someway they start to live with more fear and imaging things that inevitably are watched on TV or videogames thus, more guns are demanded. But,
Does
curfew
will
prevent
young
people
from becoming either perpetrators or victims of nighttime crime? In recent
times
curfew
have
been imposed
is
some
states from the US, this means that under no
circunstances
are
teenagers
allowed
to be in streets after certain
time
at night, there is no doubt in my mind that imposing
curfew
have its
positive
consequences
but
at the same
time
there are
some
negative
points that need to
be mentioned
.
Firstly
, although imposing
curfew
have their
possitive
consequences such as preventing
teenagers
from
being robbed
, kidnapped or getting drugs and
so
forth in easy way there is no guarantee that all these
risks
could
be avoided
, it should
no
be forgotten
that
a large number of
crimes are
commited
during the day, young
people
can
get
drugs at school
easily
and kidnappers do not hesitate when they have an opportunity whatever hour.
For instance
, in past years there have
sadly
been
some
gun shoots at schools and those attacks were during morning hours. Unfortunately, those incidents can not be
prevented
with curfew.
Secondly
, if in all cities
time
limit were
impossed
to
teenagers
they would
started
to
live
with fear regardless if their city was secure or not.
For example
, recent survey indicates that the
a large number of
teenager
are feeling more insecure than
before
due to the fact that they tend to believed that they are living like a movie story where no one can
leave
their
houses
after 10: 00pm
because
there
some
extrange
creatures looking for
people
to
eat and
they tend to believe that protection
is needed
, a gun or something that can be useful for fight against those creatures.
Hence
, this is a huge disadvantage
because
teenagers
are
tought
to
be protected
and
consequently
they believe that need a gun.
To sum up, on balance I tend to believe that where
time
limit is
impossed
teenagers
could no
get
drugs or could
be robbed
easily
but
in someway they
start
to
live
with more fear and imaging things that
inevitably
are
watched
on TV or
videogames
thus
, more guns
are demanded
.
But
,