In this advanced days, people's ability assessment is tough, but imperative for their future development. In the school year end exam is noted in a result paper. However, some students are able to perform well in year end exams due to the pressure and some of them are in under performance. Therefore, following paragraph would shed light on both approaches before making a final note. The very first drawback is the system, some students are a brilliant, but they have an exam phobia. students passing through stress. Ergo, it leads to a mental illness and they do not attempt well in year end exams. Secondly, some students are good in practical skills not in a theory. So, it affect directly on result paper. For instance, chemistry is based on practical learning, if it is observed by just the bonding of hydroxide than it get worse result it also be depends on the reaction and colour transformation. Even if students just quick memorised and does not understand concept than it is not worth it. Hence year end exam assessment is a not worthwhile despite the whole year is examine. Agreed in some field of study have a fair policy. Various courses like a medical, engineering students should need to be prepare for a final exam, if they fail so, they have an opportunity to retake the exam. For example, medical field is based on a practical and theory both to understand the concepts. So, in the year end exam they should have a knowledge about the whole course than they can attempt well in exam, and it is a portfolio of that course. On the darker side, judging student by simply one exam is unfair. Whereas, they need to be interwind with the practical and theoretical to check the student's ability. In my final analysis, except a few course policy based on academic knowledge, the student's ability should be marked upon practical performances and discipline over whole time rather than just assessed by few hours of exam at the end of the year.
In this advanced days,
people
's ability assessment is tough,
but
imperative for their future development. In the school
year
end
exam
is noted
in a result paper.
However
,
some
students
are able to perform well in
year
end
exams due to the pressure and
some
of them are in under performance.
Therefore
, following paragraph would shed light on both approaches
before
making a final note. The
very
first
drawback is the system,
some
students
are a brilliant,
but
they have an exam phobia.
students
passing through
stress
. Ergo, it leads to a mental
illness and
they do not attempt well in
year
end
exams.
Secondly
,
some
students
are
good
in
practical
skills
not in a theory.
So
, it
affect
directly
on result paper.
For instance
, chemistry
is based
on
practical
learning, if it
is observed
by
just
the bonding of hydroxide than it
get
worse result it
also
be
depends on the reaction and
colour
transformation. Even if
students
just
quick
memorised
and does not understand concept than it is not worth it.
Hence
year
end
exam assessment is a not worthwhile despite the whole
year
is
examine
.
Agreed
in
some
field of study have a
fair
policy. Various
courses
like a medical, engineering
students
should need to be
prepare
for a final exam, if they fail
so
, they have an opportunity to retake the exam.
For example
, medical field
is based
on a
practical
and theory both to understand the concepts.
So
, in the
year
end
exam they should have a knowledge about the whole
course
than they can attempt well in exam, and it is a portfolio of that
course
. On the darker side, judging
student
by
simply
one exam is unfair. Whereas, they need to be
interwind
with the
practical
and theoretical to
check
the student's ability. In my final analysis, except a few
course
policy based on academic knowledge, the student's ability should
be marked
upon
practical
performances and discipline over whole time
rather
than
just
assessed by few hours of exam at the
end
of the
year
.