Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places, such as bars, restaurants and offices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with banning smoking in public places? v.3

In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places, such as bars, restaurants and offices. with banning smoking in public places? v. 3
Recently, I read an article about prohibition of smoking in shared locations in some countries. In the article, some doctors state that it is a positive step for society. However, some merchandisers disagree and think that governments should not restrict smokers. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and support this anti-smoking campaign. Let us start with reasons why some doctors propagate that there should be limitation on smoking in public areas. The first cause is that it usually protects other members from passive smoking. Authorities should restrict the number of smoking-permitted places, because many people, who have never smoked, but have frequently stayed near smokers, address to hospitals with nicotine-related diseases such as asthma and cancer. Another reason is that it generally prevents children from copying smoking habits. A great deal of young people fall victims of smoking, since, in the desire to look grownups, they imitate adults with lighted cigarettes in the mouth, who they are likely to spot in shared places. Therefore, after analyzing these factors, it is reasonable to ban smoking in shared locations. Nevertheless, some merchandisers advocate that it is wrong to restrict smokers in places. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, it can negatively affect the sales of tobacco. Plenty of smokers have quitted smoking, since this restriction was first introduced, which has also resulted in the bankrupcy of many cigarette manufacturers as well as the decrease in tax payments to the government. Secondly, it is unfair to limit the rights of smokers. Smokers should be allowed to smoke anywhere, as like any other member of community, they have are entitled by the constitution to smoke anywhere, and any attempts to put restrictions on their rights should be seen as violation of the constitutional primacy. As a result, after taking into account these arguments, it is irrational to forbid smoking in public areas. In conclusion, although some merchandisers believe that officials should allow smoking anywhere, I think that they should keep this decision active for a long time in order to preserve the health of nation.
Recently, I read an article about prohibition of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
in shared locations in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
countries. In the article,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
doctors state that it is a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
step for society.
However
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
merchandisers disagree and
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
governments
should not restrict smokers. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and support this anti-smoking campaign.

This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Let
us
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
start
with reasons why
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
doctors propagate that there should be limitation on
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
in public areas. The
first
cause is that it
usually
protects other members from passive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
. Authorities should restrict the number of smoking-permitted places,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
because
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, who have never smoked,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
have
frequently
stayed near smokers, address to hospitals with nicotine-related diseases such as asthma and cancer. Another reason is that it
generally
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
prevents
children from copying
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
habits. A great deal of young
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
fall victims of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
, since, in the desire to look grownups, they imitate adults with lighted cigarettes in the mouth, who they are likely to spot in shared places.
Therefore
, after analyzing these factors, it is reasonable to ban
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
in shared locations.

Nevertheless
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
merchandisers advocate that it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
wrong
to restrict smokers in places. They justify their opinion with the following arguments.
Firstly
, it can
negatively
affect the sales of tobacco.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Plenty
of smokers have
Possible spelling mistake found.
quitted
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
, since this restriction was
first
introduced, which has
also
resulted in the
Possible spelling mistake found.
bankrupcy
of
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
cigarette manufacturers
as well
as the decrease in tax payments to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
.
Secondly
, it is unfair to limit the rights of smokers. Smokers should be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
allowed
to smoke anywhere, as like any other member of community, they have
are entitled
by the constitution to smoke anywhere, and any attempts to put restrictions on their rights should be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
as violation of the constitutional primacy.
As a result
, after taking into account these arguments, it is irrational to forbid
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
in public areas.

In conclusion
, although
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
merchandisers believe that officials should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
smoking
anywhere, I
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
think
that they should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
this decision active for a long time in order to preserve the health of nation.
14Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
9Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
2Mistakes
A different language is a different vision of life.
Federico Fellini

IELTS essay In recent years, many governments have brought in laws to ban smoking in public places, such as bars, restaurants and offices. with banning smoking in public places? v. 3

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
348 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts