It is true that traffic congestion is one of the major challenges of living in large cities around the world. In order to alleviate the problem, a number of people believe that the government ought to impose extremely high taxes on private vehicle ownership to encourage public transport. However, there are a number of benefits and drawbacks associated with this policy, which are elaborated on this essay.
In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
Traffic congestion in many cities around the world is severe. One possible solution to this problem is to impose heavy taxes on car drivers and use this money to make public transport better. This essay will discuss the benefits and drawbacks of such a measure.
One of the first benefits of such a measure is that the heavy taxes would discourage car owners from using their cars because it would become very expensive to drive. This would mean that they would begin to make use of public transport instead, thus reducing traffic problems and pollution as well. Another benefit would be that much more use would be made of public transport if it was improved. It is often the case that public transport in cities is very poor. For example, we often see old buses and trains that people would rather not use. High taxes would generate enough money to make the necessary changes.
Nevertheless, there are drawbacks to such a solution. First and foremost, this would be a heavy burden on the car drivers. At present, taxes are already high for a lot of people, and so further taxes would only mean less money at the end of the month for most people who may have no choice but to drive every day. In addition, this type of tax would likely be set at a fixed amount. This would mean that it would hit those with less money harder, whilst the rich could likely afford it. It is therefore not a fair tax.
In conclusion, it is certainly true that imposing extra taxes on owing personal cars might be effective in resolving the increasing global problem of traffic jams by encouraging the development of public transport facilities and their more usage by people. However, the disadvantages associated with the adaptation to this governmental policy outshine its potential benefits. Nevertheless, it is recommended that governments improve the internet infrastructures to take advantage from other effectual measures such as teleworking, distance learning and online shopping to mitigate the traffic congestion crisis. 
It is true that  
traffic
 congestion is one of the major challenges of living in large cities around the world. In order to alleviate the  
problem
, a number of  
people
 believe that the  
government
 ought to impose  
extremely
 high  
taxes
 on private vehicle ownership to encourage  
public
  transport
.  
However
, there are a number of  
benefits
 and drawbacks associated with this policy, which  
are elaborated
 on this essay.
In order to solve  
traffic
  problems
,  
governments
 should  
tax
 private  
car
 owners  
heavily
 and  
use
 the  
money
 to  
improve
  public
 transportation.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a solution?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your  
own
 experience or knowledge.
Traffic congestion in  
many
 cities around the world is severe. One possible solution to this  
problem
 is to impose heavy  
taxes
 on  
car
 drivers and  
use
 this  
money
 to  
make
  public
  transport
 better. This essay will discuss the  
benefits
 and drawbacks of such a measure.
One of the  
first
  benefits
 of such a measure is that the heavy  
taxes
 would discourage  
car
 owners from using their  
cars
  because
 it would become  
very
 expensive to drive. This would mean that they would  
begin
 to  
make
  use
 of  
public
  transport
  instead
,  
thus
 reducing  
traffic
  problems
 and pollution  
as well
. Another  
benefit
 would be that much more  
use
 would  
be made
 of  
public
  transport
 if it was  
improved
. It is  
often
 the case that  
public
  transport
 in cities is  
very
 poor.  
For example
, we  
often
  see
  old
 buses and trains that  
people
 would  
rather
 not  
use
. High  
taxes
 would generate  
enough
  money
 to  
make
 the necessary  
changes
. 
Nevertheless
, there are drawbacks to such a solution.  
First
 and foremost, this would be a heavy burden on the  
car
 drivers. At present,  
taxes
 are already high for  
a lot of
  people
, and  
so
  further
  taxes
 would  
only
 mean less  
money
 at the  
end
 of the month for most  
people
 who may have no choice  
but
 to drive every day.  
In addition
, this type of  
tax
 would likely  
be set
 at a  
fixed
 amount. This would mean that it would hit those with less  
money
 harder, whilst the rich could likely afford it. It is  
therefore
 not a  
fair
 tax. 
In conclusion
, it is  
certainly
 true that imposing extra  
taxes
 on owing personal  
cars
 might be effective in resolving the increasing global  
problem
 of  
traffic
 jams by encouraging the development of  
public
  transport
 facilities and their more usage by  
people
.  
However
, the disadvantages associated with the adaptation to this governmental policy outshine its potential  
benefits
.  
Nevertheless
, it  
is recommended
 that  
governments
  improve
 the internet infrastructures to take advantage from other effectual measures such as teleworking, distance learning and online shopping to mitigate the  
traffic
 congestion crisis.