The importance of assessing students by written examination, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of judging scholar by written examination has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the education system in the years. It can be agreed that evaluating students by written examination is a good idea. This essay will elaborate how it can weigh on a fair and regular basis and how it does not reflect students’ true abilities and thus leads us to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why students should be assessed by written examination, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it judges the learning and writing skills of students along with true exemplification of time and stress management skills by performing in a set time frame. For instance, the written examination is proven to be the most acceptable method to weigh student’s ability worldwide as they perform under the same atmosphere and circumstance. Therefore, students should be evaluated by written examination.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of assessing students by written examination, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that it does not reflects the true abilities of students as their hard work depends on writing skill, which may be affected by any domestic problems, illnesses or stress. As an illustration, a talented student may not be able to perform up to mark in the written examination as it hinders the ability of the students due to extra mental stress and pressure. Thus, students should be evaluated by a set of different methods rather than only written examination.
To conclude that although the impact of written examination is prominent, it has some drawbacks that are indeed too dire to ignore because it can sometimes hinder students’ performance and should be well handled.
The importance of assessing
students
by
written
examination
, which was always debatable, has
now
become more controversial. The substantial influence of judging scholar by
written
examination
has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the education system in the years. It can be
agreed
that evaluating
students
by
written
examination
is a
good
idea
. This essay will elaborate how it can weigh on a
fair
and regular basis and how it does not reflect
students’
true
abilities
and
thus
leads us to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why
students
should
be assessed
by
written
examination
,
but
the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it judges the learning and writing
skills
of
students
along with true exemplification of time and
stress
management
skills
by performing in a set time frame.
For instance
, the
written
examination
is proven
to be the most acceptable method to weigh
student’s
ability
worldwide as they perform under the same atmosphere and circumstance.
Therefore
,
students
should
be evaluated
by
written
examination.
Nevertheless
, there remain
some
drawbacks, which can
certainly
overwhelm the potential influence of assessing
students
by
written
examination
,
but
the most alarming one
is rooted
in the fact that it does not
reflects
the true
abilities
of
students
as their
hard
work depends on writing
skill
, which may be
affected
by any domestic problems, illnesses or
stress
. As an illustration, a talented
student
may not be able to perform up to mark in the
written
examination
as it hinders the
ability
of the
students
due to extra mental
stress
and pressure.
Thus
,
students
should
be evaluated
by a set of
different
methods
rather
than
only
written
examination.
To conclude
that although the impact of
written
examination
is prominent, it has
some
drawbacks that are
indeed
too dire to
ignore
because
it can
sometimes
hinder
students’
performance and should be well handled.