mostly multinational products are more valueable then local prodcuts. people attracted towords the corporation. in my opinion disadvantages of those interprises are grater then the advantages. supporters argues that the quality of those products are very good. they do not compromise on it. while, this may be true to some extent, it also means thatwe have less choice of products to buy. there is less opportunites for local companies because they can not keep up with messive discounts and low prices, so they go out of the business and that happens monopoly of these huge companies. so they monopolised the market. public have to except multinational products because they do not have other options to choose for example nestle. this brings me to my second point, it is sometimes said that multinational companies and globlization are making socities more open. this may true. however, i would argue that as a result the human race is loosing its cultural diversity. socities all over world would be more varied thus! consume different products, but in overall multinational supermarkets have identical producs for example weather live in china america canada you would find the same products like nestle water juice every country looks like the copy of second country, all in all, i believe that multinational products and interprises have positive and negative effects side by side. but if we as voters pressured our govt too it protect local producers from out side compitition, we could have the benefit of the globilaization without disadvantages.
mostly
multinational
products
are more
valueable
then local
prodcuts
.
people
attracted
towords
the corporation.
in
my opinion disadvantages of those
interprises
are grater then the advantages.
supporters
argues that the quality of those
products
are
very
good
.
they
do not compromise on it. while, this may be true to
some
extent, it
also
means
thatwe
have less choice of
products
to
buy
.
there
is less
opportunites
for local
companies
because
they can not
keep
up with
messive
discounts and low prices,
so
they go out of the business and that happens monopoly of these huge
companies
.
so
they
monopolised
the market.
public
have to
except
multinational
products
because
they do not have other options to choose
for example
nestle.
this
brings me to my second point, it is
sometimes
said that
multinational
companies
and
globlization
are making
socities
more open.
this
may true.
however
,
i
would argue that
as a result
the human race is loosing its cultural diversity.
socities
all over world would be more varied
thus
!
consume
different
products
,
but
in
overall
multinational
supermarkets have identical
producs
for example
weather
live
in
china
america
canada
you would find the same
products
like
nestle water juice every country looks like the copy of second country, all in all,
i
believe that
multinational
products
and
interprises
have
positive
and
negative
effects side by side.
but
if we as voters pressured our govt too it
protect
local producers from
out side
compitition
, we could have the benefit of the
globilaization
without disadvantages.