In recent times, some authorities have paid out plenty of money on celebrating the cultural festivals while it is argued that the state should not spend currency on holidays because it is squandered. I somewhat agree to spend the amount of money on celebrations.
On the one hand, the money is spent by the government on traditional celebrations would cause remember the date and look at the history. Similarly, nowadays people tend to be busy with their work and cultural festivals are also infrequent which allows that people could gather together with friends and family. As a result, crammed into a few short days, these festivals can be a fleeting yet unforgettable experienced. 21st March is a prime example, this day is called Navruz which encourages us to remember our Uzbek traditions. This has helped modern-day people to keep in touch with their partners and relatives.
On the other hand, some festivals are waste celebrating, it is vital to note that avoiding pay out money on the living conditions of people could improve their lifestyle. An explanation of this is that the amount of money may be spent to enhance areas which are health and education or to invalids. Consequently, there is a dramatic impact on the lives of citizens of the country. For example, In Uzbekistan, people prefer to celebrate different holidays as a national holiday like New Year and Navruz, and also the government spends more money for New Year than Navruz. However, it can be beneficial for the citizens, if the hard currency is allocated to it without celebrating the New Year is spent on people's way of life.
In conclusion, I somewhat believe that the amount of money is spent on traditional festivals by the government. Although holidays can be stable communication and also remember our history, there are some unnecessary holidays which are waste. So it is influential allocating money for people's circumstances instead of worthless celebrations
In recent times,
some
authorities have paid out
plenty
of
money
on celebrating the cultural
festivals
while it
is argued
that the state should not spend currency on
holidays
because
it
is squandered
. I somewhat
agree
to spend the amount of
money
on celebrations.
On the one hand, the
money
is
spent
by the
government
on traditional celebrations would cause remember the date and look at the history.
Similarly
, nowadays
people
tend to be busy with their work and cultural
festivals
are
also
infrequent which
allows
that
people
could gather together with friends and family.
As a result
, crammed into a few short days, these
festivals
can be a fleeting
yet
unforgettable experienced. 21st March is a prime example, this day
is called
Navruz
which encourages us to remember our Uzbek traditions. This has
helped
modern-day
people
to
keep
in touch with their partners and relatives.
On the other hand
,
some
festivals
are waste celebrating, it is vital to note that avoiding pay out
money
on the living conditions of
people
could
improve
their lifestyle. An explanation of this is that the amount of
money
may be
spent
to enhance areas which are health and education or to invalids.
Consequently
, there is a dramatic impact on the
lives
of citizens of the country.
For example
, In Uzbekistan,
people
prefer to celebrate
different
holidays
as a national
holiday
like New Year and
Navruz
, and
also
the
government
spends more
money
for New Year than
Navruz
.
However
, it can be beneficial for the citizens, if the
hard
currency
is allocated
to it without celebrating the New Year is
spent
on
people
's way of life.
In conclusion
, I somewhat believe that the amount of
money
is
spent
on traditional
festivals
by the
government
. Although
holidays
can be stable communication and
also
remember our history, there are
some
unnecessary
holidays
which are waste.
So
it is influential allocating
money
for
people
's circumstances
instead
of worthless
celebrations