In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. Some people think new teachers and doctors should be required to work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss both views LXYr
Very obvious but indeed a pragmatic difference of opinion has been observed amongst the different commentators about the matter of “teacher and doctors “By developing the the condition of rural areas doctors and instructor should work in rural regions as a charity but others think every one should be free choose where they work. Overall, doctor and teacher can improve the the bat situation of socitey so they should work free in rural areas. I will look at the both opinions and give my opinion clear. Firstly, Nowadays in this contemporary community masses consider that doctors and teachers should improve the free to society in addition, they can progress to public, like this, it is the significant for them, when doctors and techers try to progress they individual they fell expedient pertaining to county, fo instance, A recent study by cape breaton showed that, in japan, 70% people respect to doctors and teacher for apreciate therefore it pragmatic for public. Like wise, doctors are vital role ply in terms of improvement. Secondly, multifarious people vocalize that, doctors and teacher should work as a donation in public Moreover, they are poor they cannot efford the money, such as, some experts say that, those people who are weak in connection with money, doctors and teachers should treat free them, however its important for them that they treat with good behaviour with doctors and teachers. Conclusion, in my point of view the doctors and teachers should help their poor people similarly some people cannot go to city for treatment, so they should escalate the adroitness about the doctors and teachers
Very
obvious
but
indeed
a pragmatic difference of opinion has
been observed
amongst the
different
commentators about the matter of
“teacher
and
doctors
“By developing
the the
condition of rural areas
doctors
and instructor should
work
in rural regions as a charity
but
others
think
every one should be
free
choose where they
work
.
Overall
,
doctor
and
teacher
can
improve
the the
bat situation of socitey
so
they should
work
free
in rural areas. I will look at the both opinions and give my opinion
clear
.
Firstly
, Nowadays in this contemporary community masses consider that
doctors
and
teachers
should
improve
the
free
to society
in addition
, they can progress to public, like this, it is the significant for them, when
doctors
and
techers
try to progress they individual they fell expedient pertaining to county,
fo
instance, A recent study by cape
breaton
showed
that, in japan, 70%
people
respect to
doctors
and
teacher
for
apreciate
therefore
it
pragmatic for public. Like wise,
doctors
are vital role
ply
in terms of improvement.
Secondly
, multifarious
people
vocalize that,
doctors
and
teacher
should
work
as a donation in public
Moreover
, they are poor they cannot
efford
the money, such as,
some
experts say that, those
people
who are weak in connection with money,
doctors
and
teachers
should treat
free
them,
however
its
important
for them that they treat with
good
behaviour
with
doctors
and
teachers
. Conclusion, in my point of view the
doctors
and
teachers
should
help
their poor
people
similarly
some
people
cannot go to city for treatment,
so
they should escalate the adroitness about the
doctors
and
teachers