The world around us has a growing population, Britain is no exception to this fact. With the average age of population inclining towards the higher end of the age band, the government is tasked more than ever to take care of rehabilitating its seniors. Through this essay, I will attempt to picturize my thoughts on the matter, whether such care should be funded by the government or should it rather fall back as a responsibility of the family members.
We must consider few facts before we expect the government to bear the complete cost of such rehabilitation. As one would know, the administration is already dealing with a declining per capita over the last couple of years from its younger population. In such circumstances, increasing spending on senior care might plummet the national fund figures further. The is also the problem of assuring quality medical and nursing facilities, which currently faces an acute local skill shortage, meaning more spending on getting skilled workforce from overseas. Individuals sheltered at old homes not only require medical and nursing care but recreational/well-being activities too, contributing to another cost head. Hence, government taking complete ownership of such duties might not be the most lucrative idea in the long term.
On the other end of the spectrum, we also must touch base upon the reality, that is why most people decide to move into an old home in the first place. Increasing financial burden on the family, mainly due to the shrinking disposable income, forces some seniors to voluntarily retire in old homes. In such event putting the financial weight back on the families, to sponsor medical and well-being expenses of their elderly, will increase the strain even further.
Hence, as a concluding thought having a system in place where this responsibility is parted in a 3: 1 ration between the government and family, could be great benefit to both the parties. The government would have some breathing space in its national expenditure planning and the families can continue to care for their elderly with less worries of financial constraints. Striking a critical balance will not only promote better financial spending decision but also make the older generation feel less burdensome.
The world around us has a growing population, Britain is no exception to this fact. With the average age of population inclining towards the higher
end
of the age band, the
government
is tasked
more than ever to take
care
of rehabilitating its seniors. Through this essay, I will attempt to picturize my thoughts on the matter, whether such
care
should
be funded
by the
government
or should it
rather
fall back as a responsibility of the
family
members.
We
must
consider few facts
before
we
expect
the
government
to bear the complete cost of such rehabilitation. As one would know, the administration is already dealing with a declining per capita over the last couple of years from its younger population. In such circumstances, increasing spending on senior
care
might plummet the national fund figures
further
. The is
also
the problem of assuring quality medical and nursing facilities, which
currently
faces an acute local
skill
shortage, meaning more spending on getting skilled workforce from overseas. Individuals sheltered at
old
homes not
only
require medical and nursing
care
but
recreational/well-being activities too, contributing to another cost head.
Hence
,
government
taking complete ownership of such duties might not be the most lucrative
idea
in the long term.
On the other
end
of the spectrum, we
also
must
touch base upon the reality,
that is
why most
people
decide to
move
into an
old
home in the
first
place. Increasing
financial
burden on the
family
,
mainly
due to the shrinking disposable income, forces
some
seniors to
voluntarily
retire in
old
homes. In such
event
putting the
financial
weight back on the
families
, to sponsor medical and well-being expenses of their elderly, will increase the strain even
further
.
Hence
, as a concluding
thought
having a system in place where this responsibility
is parted
in a 3: 1 ration between the
government
and
family
, could be great benefit to both the parties. The
government
would have
some
breathing space in its national expenditure planning and the
families
can continue to
care
for their elderly with
less
worries of
financial
constraints. Striking a critical balance will not
only
promote better
financial
spending decision
but
also
make
the older generation feel less burdensome.