In some countries, a few people think that it’s compulsory to spend a big amount of money on building a new infrastructure such as railways for a fast trains among towns. Others consider that the money ought to be invested into improving existing public transport. In this essay I will discuss both opinions.
The main argument is that railways are perfect type of transport for short distances because it’s quite fast and comfortable even if compared with a plane. Also, the price of tickets is pretty low. If there are the railways for high-speed trains as a result it will allow to make a better communication between big cities and more people will be traveling between them. This innovation will improve the economy and business of towns due to increased of tourist in the cities. But there is a disadvantage of railways is that the expenditure for building of railways is so expensive and will take a lot of time thereby the government can refuse of this idea.
If there is improving of public transport it will make the communication in one exact town what is really good for citizens of that town because the will be able to get to their work or school much quicker. The main argument that it’s less expensive in terms of constructing than railways. Nevertheless, it won’t evolve the tourism in the city as a result the economy as well.
All in all, we can say that they are good ideas that will help to improve towns. I think that the money should be spend for both concepts. 
In  
some
 countries, a few  
people
  think
 that it’s compulsory to spend a  
big
 amount of money on building a new infrastructure such as  
railways
 for a  
fast
 trains among  
towns
. Others consider that the money ought to  
be invested
 into improving existing public transport. In this essay I will discuss both opinions.
The main argument is that  
railways
 are perfect type of transport for short distances  
because
 it’s quite  
fast
 and comfortable even if compared with a  
plane
.  
Also
, the price of tickets is pretty low. If there are the  
railways
 for high-speed trains  
as a result
 it will  
allow
 to  
make
 a better communication between  
big
 cities and more  
people
 will be traveling between them. This innovation will  
improve
 the economy and business of  
towns
 due to increased of tourist in the cities.  
But
 there is a disadvantage of  
railways
 is that the expenditure for building of  
railways
 is  
so
 expensive and will take  
a lot of
 time thereby the  
government
 can refuse of this  
idea
.
If there is improving of public transport it will  
make
 the communication in one exact  
town
 what is  
really
  good
 for citizens of that  
town
  because
  the
 will be able to  
get
 to their work or school much quicker. The main argument that it’s less expensive in terms of constructing than  
railways
.  
Nevertheless
, it won’t evolve the tourism in the city  
as a result
 the economy  
as well
.
All in all, we can say that they are  
good
  ideas
 that will  
help
 to  
improve
  towns
. I  
think
 that the money should be  
spend
 for both concepts.