In some countries, a few people think that it’s compulsory to spend a big amount of money on building a new infrastructure such as railways for a fast trains among towns. Others consider that the money ought to be invested into improving existing public transport. In this essay I will discuss both opinions.
The main argument is that railways are perfect type of transport for short distances because it’s quite fast and comfortable even if compared with a plane. Also, the price of tickets is pretty low. If there are the railways for high-speed trains as a result it will allow to make a better communication between big cities and more people will be traveling between them. This innovation will improve the economy and business of towns due to increased of tourist in the cities. But there is a disadvantage of railways is that the expenditure for building of railways is so expensive and will take a lot of time thereby the government can refuse of this idea.
If there is improving of public transport it will make the communication in one exact town what is really good for citizens of that town because the will be able to get to their work or school much quicker. The main argument that it’s less expensive in terms of constructing than railways. Nevertheless, it won’t evolve the tourism in the city as a result the economy as well.
All in all, we can say that they are good ideas that will help to improve towns. I think that the money should be spend for both concepts.
In
some
countries, a few
people
think
that it’s compulsory to spend a
big
amount of money on building a new infrastructure such as
railways
for a
fast
trains among
towns
. Others consider that the money ought to
be invested
into improving existing public transport. In this essay I will discuss both opinions.
The main argument is that
railways
are perfect type of transport for short distances
because
it’s quite
fast
and comfortable even if compared with a
plane
.
Also
, the price of tickets is pretty low. If there are the
railways
for high-speed trains
as a result
it will
allow
to
make
a better communication between
big
cities and more
people
will be traveling between them. This innovation will
improve
the economy and business of
towns
due to increased of tourist in the cities.
But
there is a disadvantage of
railways
is that the expenditure for building of
railways
is
so
expensive and will take
a lot of
time thereby the
government
can refuse of this
idea
.
If there is improving of public transport it will
make
the communication in one exact
town
what is
really
good
for citizens of that
town
because
the
will be able to
get
to their work or school much quicker. The main argument that it’s less expensive in terms of constructing than
railways
.
Nevertheless
, it won’t evolve the tourism in the city
as a result
the economy
as well
.
All in all, we can say that they are
good
ideas
that will
help
to
improve
towns
. I
think
that the money should be
spend
for both concepts.