The expansion of the human race is at the cost of the lives of the animals and the plants. Some people argue that this activity can't be stopped, however some believe that it has to be curbed by making proper plans. I also support the latter idea, as the flora and fauna have to be preserved for the fear of extinction and the development has to be made at the barren places.
On the one hand, growth of the mankind leads to the development of new towns and cities. This construction is being done by cutting the forests and killing the beasts. Secondly, due to the lack of planning, the new places are near the water resources, thus disturbing the ecosystem. Moreover, men hunt the wildlife for the meat and the leather products. Therefore, all this has a negative impact and that attitude can't be changed. For instance, according to the UN resolution, countries of the Asia are overcrowded and are built by sacrificing the nature.
On the other hand, there is a belief that the concepts of the origin of new societies have to be amended, in order to prevent the further damage and I also back this idea. Firstly, the behaviour of the people towards the natural sources has to be changed. Furthermore, the government has to put a ban on the destruction of plants for building houses and factories. In addition, the citizens are to be encouraged to plant more trees for the reduction of pollution. For example, the same model is being followed in the European countries.
To conclude, I think that the activities of mankind have to be under strict vigilance in order to keep the world green and to keep all the species alive.
The expansion of the human race is at the cost of the
lives
of the animals and the plants.
Some
people
argue that this activity can't be
stopped
,
however
some
believe that it
has to
be curbed
by making proper plans. I
also
support the latter
idea
, as the flora and fauna
have to
be preserved
for the fear of extinction and the development
has to
be made
at the barren places.
On the one hand, growth of the mankind leads to the development of new towns and cities. This construction is
being done
by cutting the forests and killing the beasts.
Secondly
, due to the lack of planning, the new places are near the water resources,
thus
disturbing the ecosystem.
Moreover
,
men
hunt the wildlife for the meat and the leather products.
Therefore
, all this has a
negative
impact and that attitude can't be
changed
.
For instance
, according to the UN resolution, countries of the Asia
are overcrowded
and
are built
by sacrificing the nature.
On the other hand
, there is a belief that the concepts of the origin of new societies
have to
be amended
, in order to
prevent
the
further
damage and I
also
back this
idea
.
Firstly
, the
behaviour
of the
people
towards the natural sources
has to
be
changed
.
Furthermore
, the
government
has to
put a ban on the destruction of plants for building
houses
and factories.
In addition
, the citizens are to
be encouraged
to plant more trees for the reduction of pollution.
For example
, the same model is
being followed
in the European countries.
To conclude
, I
think
that the activities of mankind
have to
be under strict vigilance in order to
keep
the world green and to
keep
all the species alive.