It is undeniable fact that human activities always cause detrimental effect in environment. Some people think that these activities can not be controlled. While, others think that a change is possible by taking actions against it. Both sides of view should be analyzed before reasoned conclusion is drawn. First of all, some group think that the human being cannot be lived without the facilities and comforts which is brought by cutting edge technology. Nowadays, the technology become modern day by day. Furthermore, the hazardous effect generated by it on the plants and animals which is not changed. Take for instance forest researchers suggest that due to industrialisation, forest areas are reducing and animals are near to extinct which can not be brought back. That is why, some people think that nature which ruined by human can not get back again. Secondly, others claim that human's hazardous activities can be minimized by taking strong action against it. Additionally, government able to make strong laws to decrease pollution and protect animals and environment. For example, some developed countries generated strong laws to control human activities and save environment. Thus some people are thought that goverment actions and laws can be able to control dangerous activities done by humans. In conclusion, it is clear that both sides have a strong grounds in their views. However, in my opinion, goverment should make laws against detrimental activities of human and protect the environment and animals which are near to extinction.
It is undeniable fact that
human
activities
always cause detrimental effect in
environment
.
Some
people
think
that these
activities
can not
be controlled
.
While
, others
think
that a
change
is possible by taking actions against it. Both sides of view should
be analyzed
before
reasoned conclusion
is drawn
.
First of all
,
some
group
think
that the
human
being cannot be
lived
without the facilities and comforts which
is brought
by cutting edge technology. Nowadays, the technology become modern day by day.
Furthermore
, the hazardous effect generated by it on the plants and
animals
which is not
changed
. Take
for instance
forest researchers suggest that due to
industrialisation
, forest areas are reducing and
animals
are near to extinct which can not
be brought
back.
That is
why,
some
people
think
that nature which ruined by
human
can not
get
back again.
Secondly
, others claim that human's hazardous
activities
can
be minimized
by taking
strong
action against it.
Additionally
,
government
able to
make
strong
laws
to decrease pollution and protect
animals
and
environment
.
For example
,
some
developed countries
generated
strong
laws
to control
human
activities
and save
environment
.
Thus
some
people
are
thought
that
goverment
actions and
laws
can be able to control
dangerous
activities
done by
humans
.
In conclusion
, it is
clear
that both sides have a
strong
grounds
in their views.
However
, in my opinion,
goverment
should
make
laws
against detrimental
activities
of
human
and protect the
environment
and
animals
which are near to extinction.