Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

How agnostids have lived

How agnostids have lived GMWBj
The material discusses how agnostids may have lived. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage. First, the reading says that agnostides were free-swimimg predators. On the other hand, the listening opposes this and states that free-swimming predators should have large and well developed eyes; however, agnostides had very tiny and poorly developed eyes. The professor adds that some of them were completely blind. Furthermore, the lecturer mentions that if agnostides were predators, they should have other special sensory organs, but there is no evidence of that. As a result, the speaker states that all these reasons could rule out the possibility of agnostids to be predators. Second, the writer posits that agnostids were seafloor dwellers. On the contrary, the lecturer refutes this and mentions that seafloor dwellers do not have the ability to move fast, so they occupy a small geographic area. Nevertheless, the professor mentions that agnostids were habitas a large geographic area; moreover, there were large distances between these areas. The lecturer points out that agnostids could move very fast, so there were not seafloor dwellers. Third, the reading states that agnostids were parasites. Conversely, the professor contradicts this and mentions that parasites polpulations should not be very large, but they should keep on a certain limit. The speaker explains that if there are too many parasites, they could kill their hots. One the other hand, the lecturer adds that there were a large population of agnostids, so their great size of population rule out their possibility to be parasites.
The material discusses how
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
may have
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
. While the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
passage.

First
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
says that
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostides
were
Possible spelling mistake found.
free-swimimg
predators.
On the other hand
, the listening opposes this and states that free-swimming predators should have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
large
and
This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
well developed
eyes;
however
,
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostides
had
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
tiny and
poorly
developed eyes. The professor
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
that
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
of them were completely blind.
Furthermore
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mentions
that if
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostides
were predators, they should have other special sensory organs,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
there is no evidence of that.
As a result
, the speaker states that all these reasons could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rule
out the possibility of
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
to be predators.

Second, the writer posits that
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
were seafloor dwellers.
On the contrary
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
refutes this and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mentions
that seafloor dwellers do not have the ability to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
they occupy a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
geographic area.
Nevertheless
, the professor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mentions
that
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
were
Possible spelling mistake found.
habitas
a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
large
geographic area;
moreover
, there were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
large
distances between these areas. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
points out that
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
could
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
move
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
there were not seafloor dwellers.

Third, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
reading
states that
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
were parasites.
Conversely
, the professor contradicts this and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
mentions
that parasites
Possible spelling mistake found.
polpulations
should not be
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
large
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
they should
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
keep
on a certain limit. The speaker
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
explains
that if there are too
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
parasites, they could kill their hots.
Did you mean "on"?
One
the other hand, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lecturer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
adds
that there were a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
large
population of
Possible spelling mistake found.
agnostids
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
their great size of population
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
rule
out their possibility to be parasites.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay How agnostids have lived

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
265 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • How agnostids have lived