Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Housing is essential for people. Some argue that the government should offer free housing for people who cannot afford it. To what extent Do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Accommodation is vital in providing stability to individuals, and for this reason, some school of thought are of the perception that shelter be made available at no cost to humans who cannot afford it. I partially agree and disagree with this notion for a number of reasons. On the one hand, issuing shelters to homeless individuals enhance safety and security. A vast majority of hoodlums and thugs are human beings without homes who have found solace in residing on the street. These individuals, overtime, learn how to disrupt the peace of their neighborhood by breaking laws and causing violent act such as stealing, gambling and fighting; which could even lead to loss of lives. For this reason, providing them with suitable apartments at no cost would tremendously decrease such crimes by reducing the number of people residing on the street. For instance, during the #EndSars protest held in Nigeria, in 2020, many businesses were vandalized and looted by hoodlums later identified to be homeless thugs making entrepreneurs loose their investment. This clearly depicts why I strongly feel free housing is necessary for poor people. On the other hand, allocating homes freely to individuals would reduce revenue generated by government agencies. One major method of generating funds used to effectively manage an economy is by collecting tax from various economical sectors such as housing. This implies that the income received by the authorities would drastically decline after giving houses freely to individuals and this can have a negative effect on other more pressing needs in the society such as healthcare or food. Furthermore, landed properties required for constructing industries and estate with the aim of generating funds for the society, would be diverted into building homes, thereby further reducing societal income. To conclude, I partially agree that houses should be given without charge to homeless people because although it can help boost safety and security levels in an economy, it can also drastically reduce the earnings of a society.
Accommodation is vital in providing stability to
individuals
, and
for this reason
,
some
school of
thought
are of the perception that shelter
be made
available at no cost to humans who cannot afford it. I
partially
agree
and disagree with this notion for a number of reasons.

On the one hand, issuing shelters to homeless
individuals
enhance safety and security. A vast majority of hoodlums and thugs are human beings without homes who have found solace in residing on the street. These
individuals
, overtime, learn how to disrupt the peace of their neighborhood by breaking laws and causing violent act such as stealing, gambling and fighting; which could even lead to loss of
lives
.
For this reason
, providing them with suitable apartments at no cost would
tremendously
decrease such crimes by reducing the number of
people
residing on the street.
For instance
, during the #
EndSars
protest held in Nigeria, in 2020,
many
businesses
were vandalized
and looted by hoodlums later identified to be homeless thugs making entrepreneurs
loose
their investment. This
clearly
depicts why I
strongly
feel free housing is necessary for poor
people
.

On the other hand
, allocating homes
freely
to
individuals
would
reduce
revenue generated by
government
agencies. One major method of generating funds
used
to
effectively
manage an economy is by collecting tax from various economical sectors such as housing.
This implies that
the income received by the authorities would
drastically
decline after giving
houses
freely
to
individuals
and this can have a
negative
effect on other more pressing needs in the society such as healthcare or food.
Furthermore
, landed properties required for constructing industries and estate with the aim of generating funds for the society, would
be diverted
into building homes, thereby
further
reducing societal income.

To conclude
, I
partially
agree
that
houses
should be
given
without charge to homeless
people
because
although it can
help
boost safety and security levels in an economy, it can
also
drastically
reduce
the earnings of a society.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Housing is essential for people. Some argue that the government should offer free housing for people who cannot afford it. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
328 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts