In some places governments prefer developing housing by creating higher apartment structures, but in other cases, the construction of houses in a broader space look better. In my opinion, both ways are good, however, each one of them should be aplied in different situations. Higher constructions might be more suitable in the city, while houses can be more effective in the countryside.
First, many scholars say that because people are opting to live in the big urban centres, these places lack of space to many public instalations, like hospitals, roads and schools. This problem could be solved or, at least, lessend with high apartments, because at the same time that these buildings can acomodate more people, it is also saving a large amount land space.
As for the countryside, constructing such buildings may not be necessary or even worth if. One of the reasons it is not useful is that the country area is less populated, so space would not be a problem. Another thing that must be taken into account is that these areas are frequently dotted with forests and lakes, and any other type of construction other than house would take away its beauty or even pose a risk to the environment. Moreover, people that live away from the city tend to earn less money, which would make it difficult to afford an apartment. In my expericence, having a house in the country is cheaper than owning an apartament.
In conclusion, the two forms of establish a housing system is valid, but depending on the caracteristics of the terrain, one or the other is more suitable. In the city, higher apartments may help save a lot of space to other important installations, whereas in the country, houses are more adequate to the environment and are cheaper than the apartments.
In
some
places
governments
prefer developing housing by creating higher
apartment
structures,
but
in
other
cases, the construction of
houses
in a broader
space
look better. In my opinion, both ways are
good
,
however
, each one of them should be
aplied
in
different
situations. Higher constructions might be more suitable in the city, while
houses
can be more effective in the countryside.
First
,
many
scholars say that
because
people
are opting to
live
in the
big
urban
centres
, these places lack of
space
to
many
public
instalations
, like hospitals, roads and schools. This problem could
be solved
or, at least,
lessend
with high
apartments
,
because
at the same time that these buildings can
acomodate
more
people
, it is
also
saving a large amount land space.
As for the countryside, constructing such buildings may not be necessary or even worth if. One of the reasons it is not useful is that the country area is less populated,
so
space
would not be a problem. Another thing that
must
be taken
into account is that these areas are
frequently
dotted with forests and lakes, and any
other
type of construction
other
than
house
would take away its beauty or even pose a
risk
to the environment.
Moreover
,
people
that
live
away from the city tend to earn less money, which would
make
it difficult to afford an
apartment
. In my
expericence
, having a
house
in the country is cheaper than owning an
apartament
.
In conclusion
, the two forms of establish a housing system is valid,
but
depending on the
caracteristics
of the terrain, one or the
other
is more suitable.
In
the city, higher
apartments
may
help
save
a lot of
space
to
other
important
installations, whereas in the country,
houses
are more adequate to the environment and are cheaper than the
apartments
.