Healthcare continues to be outrageously costly around the globe. With the increasing demand for affordable clinical care, there has been a debate about offering free healthcare. We are at the point whereby essential care should be accessible to the citizens around the globe, which is the case in countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada. Concerning the humanitarian aspect, free healthcare is a plausible attribute. Implementation of universal health, however, may be detrimental in multiple ways. As such, having free healthcare services can be advantageous, but there are several inevitable demerits.
Free healthcare services are impactful to society in numerous ways. Foremost, a plethora of benefits can be attributed to universal health. Islam (2019) notes that equality in patient care can be achieved, promoting quality of living for marginalized groups. Global health coverage is an ultimate aspect that indicates the respect and value for human rights (Islam & Li, 2019). Citizens should be provided with accessible and affordable medical care. Nevertheless, free healthcare is disadvantageous in a plethora of ways. It can adversely affect the quality of care following the increasing demand for medical attention. The caregivers, therefore, can be overwhelmed, hence affecting the delivery of care. Achieving free healthcare can demand massive capital, which may be a drawback for a nation (Hicks, 2016). All in all, accessible healthcare is beneficial and disadvantageous to society.
To end, the aspect of free healthcare is associated with merits and disadvantages. Universal health can be beneficial to vulnerable groups in a nation due to equity in accessing primary care. However, achieving free health services can be costly hence affecting the economic state in a country. Besides, quality of care can be affected due to the proliferating demand for clinical care. Despite the implications of free healthcare, government and medical institutions should consent to nurture accessibility and affordability of essential care.
Healthcare continues to be
outrageously
costly around the globe. With the increasing
demand
for affordable clinical
care
, there has been a debate about offering
free
healthcare. We are at the point whereby essential
care
should be accessible to the citizens around the globe, which is the case in countries such as the United Kingdom and Canada. Concerning the humanitarian aspect,
free
healthcare is a plausible attribute. Implementation of universal
health
,
however
, may be detrimental in multiple ways. As such, having
free
healthcare services can be advantageous,
but
there are several inevitable demerits.
Free healthcare services are impactful to society in numerous ways. Foremost, a plethora of benefits can
be attributed
to universal
health
. Islam (2019) notes that equality in patient
care
can
be achieved
, promoting quality of living for marginalized groups. Global
health
coverage is an ultimate aspect that indicates the respect and value for human rights (Islam & Li, 2019). Citizens should
be provided
with accessible and affordable medical
care
.
Nevertheless
,
free
healthcare is disadvantageous in a plethora of ways. It can
adversely
affect the quality of
care
following the increasing
demand
for medical attention. The caregivers,
therefore
, can
be overwhelmed
,
hence
affecting the delivery of
care
. Achieving
free
healthcare can
demand
massive capital, which may be a drawback for a nation (Hicks, 2016). All in all, accessible healthcare is beneficial and disadvantageous to society.
To
end
, the aspect of
free
healthcare
is associated
with merits and disadvantages. Universal
health
can be beneficial to vulnerable groups in a nation due to equity in accessing primary
care
.
However
, achieving
free
health
services can be costly
hence
affecting the economic state in a country.
Besides
, quality of
care
can be
affected
due to the proliferating
demand
for clinical
care
. Despite the implications of
free
healthcare,
government
and medical institutions should consent to nurture accessibility and affordability of essential
care
.