Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement? DBaA
In today's fast-moving economy, it is very important to deliver goods as early as possible and also at a low cost. Secondly, people traveling are expecting to travel a great distance in a short amount of time. Both the roads and railways plays important role in catering to these requirements. Building road networks and highways have its advantages. For example, public and private entities can use roads by paying tall tax. This becomes a source of income for the government which can be used in maintenance and new road construction. The road network has reach to the interior parts. However, road transportation and commutation takes more time and at times very expensive. On the other hand, railways provide fast transportation and require less amount of time. In addition, we can transport goods in great volume and more people can travel by train at the given point of time. Moreover, it costs less to travel by train. Also, the freight charges are relatively low. Despite these advantages, it requires more resources to build the railway infrastructure and maintain it. Another drawback, which is often mentioned, is that the private sector cannot utilize or contribute in expanding railways. In my opinion, these limitations can be easily overcome by implementing new policies. It will allow private players to take an active part in railway network expansion, and increasing its reach to the interior parts. To conclude, the government should not only spend money on the railway but also create an environment where private industries can also contribute to its betterment.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
's
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
-moving economy, it is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
to deliver
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
as early as possible and
also
at a low cost.
Secondly
,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
traveling are expecting to travel a great distance in a short amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
. Both the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
plays
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
important
role in catering to these requirements.

Building
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
networks and highways have its advantages.
For example
, public and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
entities can
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
roads
by paying tall tax. This becomes a source of income for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
which can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
in maintenance and new
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
construction. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
network has reach to the interior parts.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
road
transportation and commutation takes more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
and at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
times
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
expensive.

On the other hand
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railways
provide
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
fast
transportation and require less amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
In addition
, we can transport
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
in great volume and more
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
can travel by train at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
point of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
time
.
Moreover
, it costs less to travel by train.
Also
, the freight charges are
relatively
low. Despite these advantages, it requires more resources to build the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
infrastructure and maintain it. Another drawback, which is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
often
mentioned, is that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
sector cannot utilize or contribute in expanding railways.

In my opinion, these limitations can be
easily
overcome by implementing new policies. It will
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
allow
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
private
players to take an active part in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
network expansion, and increasing its reach to the interior parts.
To conclude
, the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
should not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
spend money on the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
railway
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
also
create an environment where
This phrase is redundant. Consider using "industries".
private industries
can
also
contribute to its betterment.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS essay Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. with this statement?

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
257 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?