Governments in some countries spend large amounts of money on space exploration
programmes.
Governments in some countries spend large amounts of money on space exploration
programmes. I completely agree with the idea that these are a waste of money, and that
the funds should be allocated to public services.
There are several reasons why space programmes should be abandoned. Firstly, it is
extremely expensive to train scientists and other staff involved with space missions, and
facilities and equipment also come at a huge cost to the government. Secondly, these
programmes do not benefit normal people in our daily lives; they are simply vanity projects
for politicians. Finally, many missions to space fail completely, and the smallest
technological error can cost astronauts their lives. The Challenger space shuttle disaster
showed us that space travel is extremely dangerous, and in my opinion it is not worth the
risk.
I believe that the money from space programmes should go to vital public services instead.
It is much cheaper to train doctors, teachers, police and other public service workers than
it is to train astronauts or the scientists and engineers who work on space exploration
projects. Furthermore, public servants do jobs that have a positive impact on every
member of society. For example, we all use schools, hospitals and roads, and we all need
the security that the police provide. If governments reallocated the money spent on space
travel and research, many thousands of people could be lifted out of poverty or given a
better quality of life.
In conclusion, my view is that governments should spend money on services that benefit
all members of society, and it is wrong to waste resources on projects that do not improve
our everyday lives. 
 Governments
 in  
some
 countries spend large amounts of  
money
 on  
space
 exploration 
programmes
. I completely  
agree
 with the  
idea
 that these are a waste of  
money
, and  
that
 the
 funds should  
be allocated
 to  
public
 services.
There are several reasons why  
space
  programmes
 should  
be abandoned
.  
Firstly
, it is 
extremely
 expensive to train scientists and other staff involved with  
space
 missions, and 
facilities
 and equipment  
also
  come
 at a huge cost to the  
government
.  
Secondly
, these 
programmes
 do not benefit normal  
people
 in our daily  
lives
; they are  
simply
 vanity projects 
for
 politicians.  
Finally
,  
many
 missions to  
space
 fail completely, and the smallest 
technological
 error can cost astronauts their  
lives
. The Challenger  
space
 shuttle  
disaster
 showed
 us that  
space
 travel is  
extremely
  dangerous
, and in my opinion it is not worth the 
risk
.
I believe that the  
money
 from  
space
  programmes
 should go to vital  
public
 services  
instead
.
It is much cheaper to train doctors, teachers, police and other  
public
 service workers than
it is to train astronauts or the scientists and engineers who work on  
space
 exploration 
projects
.  
Furthermore
,  
public
 servants do jobs that have a  
positive
 impact on every 
member
 of society.  
For example
, we all  
use
 schools, hospitals and roads, and we all  
need
 the
 security that the police provide.  
If
  governments
 reallocated the  
money
 spent on  
space
travel and research,  
many
 thousands of  
people
 could  
be lifted
 out of poverty or  
given
 a 
better
 quality of life. 
In conclusion
, my view is that  
governments
 should spend  
money
 on services that benefit
all members of society, and it is  
wrong
 to waste resources on projects that do not  
improve
 our
 everyday  
lives
.