Opinions are differ on where exectely authorities should spend the fund. Genrally, state utilize their financial resources in the field of arts and culture. A group of people are favour with the idea of money spending whereas others think that state authorities should spend the money on basic needs of human rather than others such as in the sector of health and education. This essay will not only discuss both views but my opinion also will be highlighted while concluding this.
Focusing on the first view, most important point put forward from the supporters who support to spend money on arts is that history gives a glance of nations. By this I mean that, historical places and cultural activities are back bone of every country. it is a fundamental duty of government to protect that with taking proper care of the place. So it is fruitful to utilize currency on these places in order to protect nation's pride. Moreove, history is the only one option from which youth can get knowledge about the culture of their own motherland. In other words, today's generation is not aware about ancient's struggle for saving the nation. To add to this, younger one can get practical knowledge from the historical places. As an example, statue of unity at America. American government spent 1000$ to make this and today it is as well maintained as earlier and Americans get inspiration from that to stay with unity. Hence, use money for historical places provide moral values to natives as well as government.
On the other hand later viewers have their own view points. First important point put forward from them is that mankind's well-being is far more important rather that conservation of history. To elaborate it, in country there are more than half population who are suffering from the different deacease due to lack of awareness about health protection. Ergo, authorities ought to invest money to arrange some awareness campus on health so people can combat with the issue of health problems. Apart from this, education is also need funding support from the government to improve the technical resources in the same. To examplifie it, Italian government spend 32m $ on renovation of historical places which was as sufficient to provide the education to 25% of children from whole population; who can not afford the educational fees. So, in order to provide priority need to citizens government should spend more money on that things rather than faculty of arts.
To conclude and offer my position, I would support the later view than the former one to reason being I believe that provide knowledge and safety is an essential things. However, investing money on ancient gallery is also important for introducing nation's pride but not as important as basic needs.
Opinions are
differ
on where
exectely
authorities should
spend
the fund.
Genrally
, state utilize their financial resources in the field of arts and culture. A group of
people
are
favour
with the
idea
of
money
spending whereas others
think
that state authorities should
spend
the
money
on basic
needs
of human
rather
than others such as in the sector of
health
and education. This essay will not
only
discuss both
views
but
my opinion
also
will
be highlighted
while concluding this.
Focusing on the
first
view
, most
important
point put forward from the supporters who support to
spend
money
on arts is that history gives a glance of nations. By this I mean that,
historical
places
and cultural activities are back bone of every country.
it
is a fundamental duty of
government
to protect that with taking proper care of the
place
.
So
it is fruitful to utilize currency on these
places
in order to protect nation's pride.
Moreove
, history is the
only
one option from which youth can
get
knowledge about the culture of their
own
motherland. In
other
words,
today
's generation is not aware about ancient's struggle for saving the nation. To
add
to this, younger one can
get
practical knowledge from the
historical
places
. As an example, statue of unity at America. American
government
spent
1000$
to
make
this and
today
it is
as well
maintained as earlier and Americans
get
inspiration from that to stay with unity.
Hence
,
use
money
for
historical
places
provide
moral values to natives
as well
as
government
.
On the
other
hand later viewers have their
own
view
points.
First
important
point put forward from them is that mankind's well-being is far more
important
rather
that conservation of history. To elaborate it, in country there are more than half population who are suffering from the
different
deacease
due to lack of awareness about
health
protection. Ergo, authorities ought to invest
money
to arrange
some
awareness campus on
health
so
people
can combat with the issue of
health
problems. Apart from this, education is
also
need
funding support from the
government
to
improve
the technical resources in the same. To
examplifie
it, Italian
government
spend
32m
$ on renovation of
historical
places
which was as sufficient to
provide
the education to 25% of children from whole population; who can not afford the educational fees.
So
, in order to
provide
priority
need
to citizens
government
should
spend
more
money
on that things
rather
than faculty of arts.
To conclude
and offer my position, I would support the later
view
than the former one to reason being I believe that
provide
knowledge and safety is an essential
things
.
However
, investing
money
on ancient gallery is
also
important
for introducing nation's pride
but
not as
important
as basic
needs
.