In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue whether the government should spend their money on developing sports and arts for supporting professionals for mass people. A lion's share of the society favours development, however, the rest goes adverse and favours professionals. I do not completely agree with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should be encouraged to participate in these skills for their growth and development. This is because, learners should have autonomy to choose, which help them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life. For example, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the Neuro- cognitive development of these students who were involved in skills like sports or arts (music, painting, dancing). In contrast, a strict supervision should be done on children so that they do not over indulge and loose concentration from academics. Subsequently, they would perform mediocrity in both aspects of life.
On the other hand, I believe bureaucrats should motivate the professional aspect of these skills. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism as well as generate revenue, which would help in boosting economy of a country. For instance, in my own experience, I am a professional tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to this. As a result, I donate this amount for the welfare of my state. However, the athletes should not exploit this gift for their personal benefits.
To conclude, it can be reiterated that spending on professional sports and cultural programs is imperative for the governments. Promoting sports in schools should also be there, but not at the expense of professional sports and cultural events.
In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue whether the
government
should spend their money on developing
sports
and arts for supporting
professionals
for mass
people
. A lion's share of the society
favours
development,
however
, the rest goes adverse and
favours
professionals
. I do not completely
agree
with either of these perspectives and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, students should
be encouraged
to participate in these
skills
for their growth and development. This is
because
, learners should have autonomy to choose, which
help
them to acknowledge new dimensions of their life.
For example
, according to a report published by the UK newspaper in 2011, highlighted the
Neuro
- cognitive development of these students who
were involved
in
skills
like
sports
or arts (music, painting, dancing).
In contrast
, a strict supervision should
be done
on children
so
that they do not over indulge and loose concentration from academics.
Subsequently
, they would perform mediocrity in both aspects of life.
On the other hand
, I believe bureaucrats should motivate the
professional
aspect of these
skills
. The reason is that, it would create a sense of patriotism
as well
as generate revenue, which would
help
in boosting economy of a country.
For instance
, in my
own
experience, I am a
professional
tennis player and have received tremendous accolades and financial benefits due to this.
As a result
, I donate this amount for the welfare of my state.
However
, the athletes should not exploit this gift for their personal benefits.
To conclude
, it can
be reiterated
that spending on
professional
sports
and cultural programs is imperative for the
governments
. Promoting
sports
in schools should
also
be there,
but
not at the expense of
professional
sports
and cultural
events
.