Always people have arguments especially when it comes to what governments must do to their citizens. one of these arguments is that an unemployed individual ought to have a cell phone and internet accsess for free. This is based on the fact that this would be a sufficient spending of public money. furthermore, this would help in reducing the problem of unemployment. In my opinion, I agree with this argument only if a person would use that for working as a free lancer.
First, we live in the era of technology where people could make money by only pressing a button. Mobile phones are not just devices for making calls, they are small computers on the go. For example, a person who likes photography can use the phones's camera to take beautiful pictures. Those pictures can be posted online and might have a positive effect on him. The first and obvious effect is consuming his free time doing somthing that he loves. Additionally, those pictures could be good enough to atract a person who can offer a job.
In contrast, such idea may cause a negative effect on the society. People loves free things, and if a persons knows already that he can have a phone and an internet access for free, he/she may not work hard enough as supposed to be. In other words, This idea could produce a spoiled society. For example, in Saudi Arabia, we have a program to suppurt unemployed individuals. One of the negative effect of this program, people relyed on it during the process of finding a job. They wait for the job they want rather than working until they find the right job.
Finally, government are obiligated to find what is the best for their citizens.
Always
people
have arguments
especially
when it
comes
to what
governments
must
do to their citizens.
one
of these arguments is that an unemployed individual ought to have a cell phone and internet
accsess
for
free
. This
is based
on the fact that this would be a sufficient spending of public money.
furthermore
, this would
help
in reducing the problem of unemployment. In my opinion, I
agree
with this argument
only
if a
person
would
use
that for working as a
free lancer
.
First
, we
live
in the era of technology where
people
could
make
money by
only
pressing a button. Mobile phones are not
just
devices for making calls, they are
small
computers on the go.
For example
, a
person
who likes photography can
use
the
phones's
camera to take
beautiful
pictures. Those pictures can
be posted
online and might have a
positive
effect
on him. The
first
and obvious
effect
is consuming his
free
time doing
somthing
that he
loves
.
Additionally
, those pictures could be
good
enough
to
atract
a
person
who can offer a job.
In contrast
, such
idea
may cause a
negative
effect
on the society.
People
loves
free
things, and if a
persons
knows already that he can have a phone and an internet access for
free
, he/she may not work
hard
enough
as supposed to be.
In other words
, This
idea
could produce a spoiled society.
For example
, in Saudi Arabia, we have a program to
suppurt
unemployed individuals. One of the
negative
effect
of this program,
people
relyed
on it during the process of finding a job. They wait for the job they want
rather
than working until they find the right job.
Finally
,
government
are
obiligated
to find what is the best for their citizens.