The professional sports and the cultural programs have been in existence for a long time and have played an important part in people life. Therefore, I disagree that the government should direct the funds allocated to such events towards encouraging sports and arts among school students. A number of arguments support my opinion.
To begin with, the professional sports bring name and fame to a country. Countries, which spends a lot on such sports, are always leading in sports in the Olympic Games, the World Cup and other such International competitions. Professional sports also boost the economy as millions of spectators come to see and cheer for their favourite teams in the stadiums. There are also big benefits from advertisements on TV as millions of people sit in front of the TV and watch sports shows.
Furthermore, the cultural programs are effective ways that help people relax and reduce stress after work. Every day, there are a variety of cultural performances happening a; over the world. There are fascinating thousands of young people as well as adults. These cultural programs not only enrich people’s mind, but also spread our rich culture globally.
Finally, it is difficult to motivate children to take up sports and arts without naming and praising superstars in professional activities. The success of people such as Sachin Tendulkar (a cricket player) or A R Rahman (a musician) is even more important in encouraging children to participate in sport and art subjects and any other kind of motivators. How could we tell our children to put more efforts on arts and sports if it would not lead to any money and success in the future?
To sum up, it can be reiterated that spending on professional sports and cultural programs is imperative for the governments. Promoting sports in school should also be there, but not at the expense of professional sports and cultural events.
The
professional
sports
and the
cultural
programs
have been in existence for a long time and have played an
important
part in
people
life.
Therefore
, I disagree that the
government
should direct the funds allocated to such
events
towards encouraging
sports
and
arts
among school students. A number of arguments support my opinion.
To
begin
with, the
professional
sports
bring name and fame to a country. Countries, which spends a lot on such
sports
, are always leading in
sports
in the Olympic Games, the World Cup and other such International competitions.
Professional
sports
also
boost the economy as millions of spectators
come
to
see
and cheer for their
favourite
teams in the stadiums. There are
also
big
benefits from advertisements on TV as millions of
people
sit in front of the TV and
watch
sports
shows
.
Furthermore
, the
cultural
programs
are effective ways that
help
people
relax and
reduce
stress
after work. Every day, there are a variety of
cultural
performances happening
a;
over the world. There are fascinating thousands of young
people
as well
as adults. These
cultural
programs
not
only
enrich
people’s
mind,
but
also
spread our rich culture globally.
Finally
, it is difficult to motivate children to take up
sports
and
arts
without naming and praising superstars in
professional
activities. The success of
people
such as
Sachin
Tendulkar
(a cricket player) or A R Rahman (a musician) is even more
important
in encouraging children to participate in
sport
and
art
subjects and any other kind of motivators. How could we
tell
our children to put more efforts on
arts
and
sports
if it would not lead to any money and success in the future?
To sum up, it can
be reiterated
that spending on
professional
sports
and
cultural
programs
is imperative for the
governments
. Promoting
sports
in school should
also
be there,
but
not at the expense of
professional
sports
and
cultural
events
.