It is certainly true that an artist plays an indispensable role in the development of the nation. Nowadays, the ruling body is providing a plethora of amenities to preserve its artistic heritage. Some would argue that there are some important issues besides it that should be given priority, whereas others say that it is extremely crucial to take necessary steps to save their culture and heritage. While spending more money on other issues will definitely curb them, I believe that there should be a separate budget for art.
On the one hand, there are many important issues such as poverty, unemployment and starvation that can be easily overcome by spending more money in required fields. Many times, the government in developing nations spent money unwisely on other things and overlook their main issues. If a government cannot control the unemployment and inflation rate, then there will be no importance to invest money in art. For example, in the United State, the government focuses more on the primary requirements of citizens rather than spending blindly on art. However, I think that utilizing more money on crucial issues does not mean that there is no need to spend money on art. It would be better to provide some additional budget to artists before they become extinct.
On the other hand, it is considered that spending money on art would not only assist to save the heritage but also boost the economy of the country. It will generate a lot of employment and tourism at various artistic and historical places. In addition to this, it will create a lot of opportunities for inhabitants to earn money from tourists. For instance, the monument of Sardar Patel built up near Ahmedabad by the government of India is generating high revenue and thus helping the ruling body as well as native people. I believe this idea is preferable because it will also overcome the other issues to some extent.
In conclusion, although there are some crucial issues that should be curbed yet overlooking the artists would not actually solve the problem, because they also play a vital role for the development of the nation. 
It is  
certainly
 true that an artist plays an indispensable role in the development of the nation. Nowadays, the ruling body is providing a plethora of amenities to preserve its artistic heritage.  
Some
 would argue that there are  
some
  important
  issues
  besides
 it that should be  
given
 priority, whereas others say that it is  
extremely
 crucial to take necessary steps to save their culture and heritage. While  
spending
 more  
money
 on  
other
  issues
 will definitely curb them, I believe that there should be a separate budget for art.
On the one hand, there are  
many
  important
  issues
 such as poverty, unemployment and starvation that can be  
easily
 overcome by  
spending
 more  
money
 in required fields.  
Many
 times, the  
government
 in developing nations spent  
money
  unwisely
 on  
other
 things and overlook their main  
issues
. If a  
government
 cannot control the unemployment and inflation rate, then there will be no importance to invest  
money
 in  
art
.  
For example
, in the United State, the  
government
 focuses more on the primary requirements of citizens  
rather
 than  
spending
  blindly
 on  
art
.  
However
, I  
think
 that utilizing more  
money
 on crucial  
issues
 does not mean that there is no need to spend  
money
 on  
art
. It would be better to provide  
some
 additional budget to artists  
before
 they become extinct.
On the  
other
 hand, it  
is considered
 that  
spending
  money
 on  
art
 would not  
only
 assist to save the heritage  
but
  also
 boost the economy of the country. It will generate  
a lot of
 employment and tourism at various artistic and historical places.  
In addition
 to this, it will create  
a lot of
 opportunities for inhabitants to earn  
money
 from tourists.  
For instance
, the monument of  
Sardar
 Patel built up near Ahmedabad by the  
government
 of India is generating high revenue and  
thus
 helping the ruling body  
as well
 as native  
people
. I believe this  
idea
 is preferable  
because
 it will  
also
 overcome the  
other
  issues
 to  
some
 extent. 
In conclusion
, although there are  
some
 crucial  
issues
 that should  
be curbed
  yet
 overlooking the artists would not actually solve the problem,  
because
 they  
also
 play a vital role for the development of the nation.