The probability of being a victim of crime is much higher in cities than in smaller towns or villages. This trend is mainly due to the anonymity of urban spaces and the prevalence of poverty in inner-city areas. However, there is a range of measures that could be implemented to resolve the issue of city crime.
One of the reasons for the low crime rate in rural centres is their stronger sense of community. In small towns, the likelihood of people knowing their neighbors is very high and, as a result of these stronger community links, people are both less likely to commit a crime and more likely to be arrested if they do. Another cause is the potential financial return of a crime, which is much higher in major cities than small towns. Compare, for example, the amount of money a thief would make from robbing a major urban supermarket as opposed to a local convenience store. However, it is probably the vast gap between the rich and poor in cities that triggers most urban crime. When people living in poverty live in close proximity to the wealthiest members of a society, it is no wonder that crime occurs.
There are a number of ways to lower the urban crime rate. Firstly, the government should invest in community policing. If people see the same police officers everyday, not only will it foster a sense of togetherness in the public, but it will also make criminals fear being recognized for a crime. The best way to tackle inner-city crime, however, would be to narrow the gap in the standard of living between all city dwellers through tax reform, which would reduce people’s motivation for committing a crime. Although I concede that this would be a difficult task, it is interesting that crime is less of a problem in Scandinavian cities than American ones, which must surely be the outcome of their much fairer social welfare system.
In conclusion, the lack of community in urban areas and the wide gap between rich and poor both lead urban areas to suffer more from crime than rural ones. Only When governments are able to ensure that everybody living in a city has the same wealth and opportunities, will this situation be remedied.
The probability of being a victim of
crime
is much higher in
cities
than in smaller towns or villages. This trend is
mainly
due to the anonymity of
urban
spaces and the prevalence of poverty in inner-city areas.
However
, there is a range of measures that could
be implemented
to resolve the issue of city crime.
One of the reasons for the low
crime
rate in rural
centres
is their stronger sense of
community
. In
small
towns, the likelihood of
people
knowing their neighbors is
very
high and,
as a result
of these stronger
community
links,
people
are both less likely to commit a
crime
and more likely to
be arrested
if they do. Another cause is the potential financial return of a
crime
, which is much higher in major
cities
than
small
towns. Compare,
for example
, the amount of money a thief would
make
from robbing a major
urban
supermarket as opposed to a local convenience store.
However
, it is
probably
the vast gap between the rich and poor in
cities
that triggers most
urban
crime
. When
people
living in poverty
live
in
close proximity
to the wealthiest members of a society, it is no wonder that
crime
occurs.
There are a number of ways to lower the
urban
crime
rate.
Firstly
, the
government
should invest in
community
policing. If
people
see
the same police officers
everyday
, not
only
will it foster a sense of togetherness in the public,
but
it will
also
make
criminals fear
being recognized
for a
crime
. The best way to tackle inner-city
crime
,
however
, would be to narrow the gap in the standard of living between all city dwellers through tax reform, which would
reduce
people’s
motivation for committing a
crime
. Although I concede that this would be a difficult task, it is interesting that
crime
is less of a problem in Scandinavian
cities
than American ones, which
must
surely
be the outcome of their much fairer social welfare system.
In conclusion
, the lack of
community
in
urban
areas and the wide gap between rich and poor both lead
urban
areas to suffer more from
crime
than rural ones.
Only
When
governments
are able to ensure that everybody living in a city has the same wealth and opportunities, will this situation
be remedied
.