One of the conventional methods, arranging seminars in massive halls to educate vast number of pupils, has remained popular even till now. Availability of technology at current time questions the efficiency of conventional methods and should be replaced with it and migrate online. I strongly agree with the migration to online mode considering its advantages over the conventional methods.
First of all, to conduct an online lecture to same strength of students, can be easily achieved with a lot of less resources and less cost than offline arrangement. For example, it can be carried out with the help of a simple computer and an internet connection, saving the cost of a hall, seating arrangements, electricity and much more. But, a beneficial factor for offline arrangement will always prevail as physical attendance always creates a connection between speaker and audience which definitely improves the overall outcome.
Secondly, attending an online lecture saves a considerable amount of time wasted as transit time. This time can be used for another productive work or for enjoyment with family, which we cannot put up price to. Also having eliminated the transit time, the stress that often comes with it also eliminates, carving a way for improved productivity. Also, when transport is no longer required for the transit, there will be a cut to vehicle emissions, promoting environment rehabilitation as they are a significant factor for global warming. For example, if we cut 500 miles of travel on a car, we cut a 0. 5 metric ton emission of greenhouse gases.
In conclusion, giving lectures in large auditoriums has some advantages but conducting them online has a considerable amount of benefits such as reduction in cost, cutting transit time, and reduction in emission gases diminishing global warming.
One of the conventional methods, arranging seminars in massive halls to educate vast number of pupils, has remained popular even till
now
. Availability of technology at
current
time
questions the efficiency of conventional methods and should
be replaced
with it and migrate
online
. I
strongly
agree
with the migration to
online
mode considering its advantages over the conventional methods.
First of all
, to conduct an
online
lecture to same strength of students, can be
easily
achieved with
a lot of
less resources and less cost than offline arrangement.
For example
, it can
be carried
out with the
help
of a simple computer and an internet connection, saving the cost of a hall, seating arrangements, electricity and much more.
But
, a beneficial factor for offline arrangement will always prevail as physical attendance always creates a
connection between
speaker and audience which definitely
improves
the
overall
outcome.
Secondly
, attending an
online
lecture saves a considerable amount of
time
wasted as
transit
time
. This
time
can be
used
for another productive work or for enjoyment with family, which we cannot put up price to.
Also
having eliminated the
transit
time
, the
stress
that
often
comes
with it
also
eliminates, carving a way for
improved
productivity.
Also
, when transport is no longer required for the
transit
, there will be a
cut
to vehicle emissions, promoting environment rehabilitation as they are a significant factor for global warming.
For example
, if we
cut
500 miles
of travel on a car, we
cut
a 0. 5 metric ton emission of greenhouse gases.
In conclusion
, giving lectures in large auditoriums has
some
advantages
but
conducting them
online
has a considerable amount of benefits such as reduction in cost, cutting
transit
time
, and reduction in emission gases diminishing global warming.