Gigiturufuf ftitot uffut hfufit fititioy xhftit
Gigiturufuf ftitot uffut hfufit fititioy xhftit yxNNd
It is observed that there is difference of paying college or school fee in countries, either it is paid by the regime or by students. While providing free of charge university education is disadvantageous for government because it raises their financial burden, However i believe its advantages outweigh the disadvantages because it gives a chance to children of deprive society to get higher education.
On the one hand, providing scholarship by government for graduation increases financial burden on them. This is because, regimes have limited resources to earn money but have lots of public sectors to invest it, which require investment more than education sector. If government pays education charges of university students, they will have to pay a big amount. Apart from it, in order to fulfill demand of money of other departments, they could take international loan, which may increase financial pressure on government. For example, India cut down money from their annually education budget of 2020 because of financial crises. However, provided money for college pupils is beneficial for poor children since they also can get higher education.
On the other hand, involvement of government money to pay fee for college learners creates opportunity for poor students to carry on their studies. To explain it, poor parents do not have much money, and they can fulfill only basic needs of their children for living, which do not allow them to send their children in universities to complete their graduation. When authorities serve free education, poor students can also continue their study independently. Therefore, this trend has more benefits rather than losses. For example, mostly learners who study in public colleges and universities are from backward background in India.
In conclusion, even though paying study expenses of higher education students can lead financial pressure on authorities, I believe it has more merits than demerits because it will provide education to economically background pupils.
It
is observed
that there is difference of paying college or school fee in countries, either it
is paid
by the regime or by
students
. While providing free of charge
university
education
is disadvantageous for
government
because
it raises their
financial
burden,
However
i
believe its advantages outweigh the disadvantages
because
it gives a chance to
children
of deprive society to
get
higher education.
On the one hand, providing scholarship by
government
for graduation increases
financial
burden on them. This is
because
, regimes have limited resources to earn
money
but
have lots of public sectors to invest it, which require investment more than
education
sector. If
government
pays
education
charges of
university
students
, they will
have to
pay a
big
amount. Apart from it, in order to fulfill demand of
money
of other departments, they could take international loan, which may increase
financial
pressure on
government
.
For example
, India
cut
down
money
from their
annually
education
budget of 2020
because
of
financial
crises.
However
, provided
money
for college pupils is beneficial for
poor
children
since they
also
can
get
higher education.
On the other hand
, involvement of
government
money
to pay fee for college learners creates opportunity for
poor
students
to carry on their
studies
. To
explain
it,
poor
parents do not have much
money
, and they can fulfill
only
basic needs of their
children
for living, which do not
allow
them to
send
their
children
in
universities
to complete their graduation. When authorities serve free
education
,
poor
students
can
also
continue their
study
independently
.
Therefore
, this trend has more benefits
rather
than losses.
For example
,
mostly
learners who
study
in public colleges and
universities
are from backward background in India.
In conclusion
,
even though
paying
study
expenses of higher
education
students
can lead
financial
pressure on authorities, I believe it has more merits than demerits
because
it will provide
education
to
economically
background pupils.