Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. To what extent do you agree?

In today’s modern era of technology, to serve the requirements of civilization scientists regard genetic engineering as a crucial scientific work. Whereas some believe that there is no doubt about its significance, and benefits but some renowned scientists believe use of genes could be quite harmful, and should be restricted up to some extent. I strongly second this view as too much of anything is not good for health so is with genetic engineering. Although the positive outcomes of genetic engineering are enormous, like fighting with diseases for instance, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, and several other diseases. There are many questions raised that needs to be answered. Firstly, one can’t predict outcomes of genetic engineering would make on environment. The release of newly engineered genetic organism could create problems in the region of ecology, creating an imbalance just the exotic species would do. An accident in engineering the genetic of virus or bacteria for example, which could result in stronger, and dangerous type. It could cause serious epidemic or pandemic if released. In addition, it could be fatal for human beings resulting in severe illness or death. Furthermore, genetic engineering could create unknown side effects. Certain amount of changes in plant or animal would create unpredicted allergic reactions in some people, which in its original form never did. Also, other changes could result in toxicity to human or the other organism. It seems irrefutable to deny the dangerous outcomes related to genetic engineering. Several issues from certain scientists has also been raised as regards in acceptance of this technology. These concerns range from ethical issues to lack knowledge. For instance, once an altered gene is placed in an organism it cannot be reversed. To sum up, genetic engineering has enormous benefits but so are the risks and unknown effects. I believe that genetic engineering is revolutionary but the outcomes could be harmful so use of it should be limited.
In
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
today
’s modern era of technology, to serve the requirements of civilization scientists regard
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
as a crucial scientific work. Whereas
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
believe that there is no doubt about its significance, and benefits
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
renowned scientists believe
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of genes could be quite harmful, and should
be restricted
up to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
extent. I
strongly
second this view as too much of anything is not
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
for health
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
is with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
engineering.

Although the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
positive
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
outcomes
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
are enormous, like fighting with diseases
for instance
, diabetes, cystic fibrosis, and several other diseases. There are
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
many
questions raised that needs to
be answered
.
Firstly
, one can’t predict
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
outcomes
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
would
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
on environment. The release of
newly
engineered
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
organism could create problems in the region of ecology, creating an imbalance
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
the exotic species would do. An accident in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
of virus or bacteria
for example
, which could result in stronger, and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
type. It could cause serious epidemic or pandemic if released.
In addition
, it could be fatal for human beings resulting in severe illness or death.

Furthermore
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
could create unknown side effects. Certain amount of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
in plant or animal would create unpredicted allergic reactions in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
, which in its original form never did.
Also
, other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
changes
could result in toxicity to human or the other organism. It seems irrefutable to deny the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
outcomes
related to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
. Several issues from certain scientists has
also
been raised
as regards in acceptance of this technology. These concerns range from ethical issues to lack knowledge.
For instance
, once an altered gene
is placed
in an organism it cannot
be reversed
.

To sum up,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
has enormous benefits
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
are the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
risks
and unknown effects. I believe that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
genetic
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
engineering
is revolutionary
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
outcomes
could be harmful
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
use
of it should
be limited
.

IELTS essay Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited.

Essay
  American English
4 paragraphs
318 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • Include an introduction and conclusion
  • Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. To what extent do you agree?