Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. To what extent do you agree?

Genetic engineering is a dangerous trend. It should be limited. LMmR

Nowadays, genetic engineering is so common, all around the world as a result of advanced science. But it is argued by some, that its restriction is a necessity. My agreement is because of its harmful and suffering effects on alive creatures. It is known by all that this type of science, mostly used for modifying the structure of alive creatures include plants, qnimals and even humans in some brief cases. In this vein, it not only ruins the creatures foods but also makes their life more vulnrable. Because firstly, those foods are absolutely unreliable because of the toxical and chemical elements that maintains and those structural modifictions which is unknown, if it is beneficial or harmful! For instance, some of these GM rats had been eaten by a chinees couple, few years ago and dense of problems established for them and caused two weeks administration for them! On the other hand, animals, specially rats and hamsters, are mostly used for these scientific genetical experiments, which means, neither there is not no more comfortablity in animals life, nor their life is in danger. For example, an special kind of monkeys have been died out and an specific kind of rabbits generation are endangered now because of the same inhuman reason. Additionally, vegetables are consumed to be blent to various types for process of new plant production. As a result, the natural habitat is also in danger. Following this point, both plants diversity and animals home will be ruined in the near future. In conclusion, it must become as governments priority to posess serious limitations and prevent the destruction of creatures life and their living area.

Nowadays, genetic engineering is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:consequently
so
 common, all around the world as a result
 of advanced science. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
But
 it is argued
 by This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
, that its restriction is a necessity. My agreement is This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of its harmful and suffering effects on alive creatures.

It is known
 by all that this type of science, mostly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for modifying the structure of alive creatures include plants, Possible spelling mistake found.animals
qnimals
 and even humans in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 brief cases. In this vein, it not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 ruins the creatures foods This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :createsconstructsmanufacturesproduces
makes
 their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 more Possible spelling mistake found.vulnerable
vulnrable
. This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
Because
firstly
, those foods are absolutely
 unreliable This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the Possible spelling mistake found.topical
toxical
 and chemical elements that maintains and those structural Possible spelling mistake found.modifications
modifictions
 which is unknown, if it is beneficial or harmful! For instance
, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:a number of
some
 of these GM rats had been eaten
 by a This expression can be considered offensive.
chinees
 couple, few years ago and dense of problems established for them and caused two weeks administration for them!

On the other hand
, animals, specially
 rats and hamsters, are mostly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for these scientific Possible spelling mistake found.geneticgeneticallygeneticsheretical
genetical
 experiments, which means, neither there is Double negatives are discouraged in standard English. Can you reformulate this phrase or is a comma missing?
not no
 more Possible spelling mistake found.comfortably
comfortablity
 in animals You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
, nor their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 is in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
. For example
, Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'a
an
 special kind of monkeys have been This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :passed away
died
 out and Use "a" instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'a
an
 specific kind of rabbits generation are endangered
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :nowadays
now
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:due to the factin light of the fact thatowing to the fact that
because
 of the same inhuman reason.

Additionally
, vegetables are consumed
 to be Possible spelling mistake found.blendbentlentBrentbluntLent
blent
 to various types for process of new plant production. As a result
, the natural habitat is also
 in This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :hazardrisk
danger
. Following this point, both plants diversity and animals home will be ruined
 in the near future.

In conclusion
, it This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :require
must
 become as This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :national authoritiespublic authorities
governments
 priority to Possible spelling mistake found.possessposespossesposers
posess
 serious limitations and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :preclude
prevent
 the destruction of creatures You use this word too often, consider replacing it withheartgrowthsoulactivity
life
 and their living area. 