Although funding for public improvement have many obvious positive affects to the development of the society, there are many argues that the entertainment should get a greater care from responsible authorities. Personally I do not agree with this claim because the essencial of equality of both stratergies.
On the one hand, providing financial support to improve the quality of entertainment activities such as art, music and film could be very benificial. It is clear that, when people receive a higher quality of entertainment, the citizen's satisfy level will be increased. For example, if fine art is invested more which allow artists have greater ability to express their work, there will be more tallent studens persua their passionate. Moreover, if film makers get an appropriate support, they will tend to make movies with a better content such as educational documentary or historical movies which indirectly educate general population. Additionally, when having high quality entertainment, the commulity could be satisfy with what they have instead of searching for many foreign sources which probably provide undesirable contents.
On the other hand, when focusing on improving public services, the government could be able to cope with many social issues. Firstly, it is obvious that to improve a country intellectural level, the responsible authorities should give a sustainable expenditure on education. Many evidences have addressed that a strong nation is depended on the up coming generations who should have an appropriate knowledge and skills to due with many contemporary issues such as environmental pollution and economic growth. Secondly, health care also a key factor should be taken into account. As a negative affect accomulated gradually by human living activities, nowadays, people have to face with many serious health problems which require a significant medical involvement in all around the world. In this case, the health care system do need a long term investment to keep up with the dynamic situation of global health.
In conclusion, based on the importance of both entertainments and social services, governments should have a balanced expenditure to keep the society developt comprehensively.
Although funding for public improvement have
many
obvious
positive
affects to the development of the society, there are
many
argues that the entertainment should
get
a greater care from responsible authorities.
Personally
I do not
agree
with this claim
because
the
essencial
of equality of both
stratergies
.
On the one hand, providing financial support to
improve
the quality of entertainment activities such as art, music and film could be
very
benificial
. It is
clear
that, when
people
receive a higher quality of entertainment, the citizen's satisfy level will
be increased
.
For example
, if fine art
is invested
more which
allow
artists have greater ability to express their work, there will be more
tallent
studens
persua
their passionate.
Moreover
, if film makers
get
an appropriate support, they will tend to
make
movies with a better content such as educational documentary or historical movies which
indirectly
educate general population.
Additionally
, when having high quality entertainment, the
commulity
could be
satisfy
with what they have
instead
of searching for
many
foreign sources which
probably
provide undesirable contents.
On the other hand
, when focusing on improving public services, the
government
could be able to cope with
many
social issues.
Firstly
, it is obvious that to
improve
a country
intellectural
level, the responsible authorities should give a sustainable expenditure on education.
Many
evidences have addressed that a strong nation
is depended
on the up coming generations who should have an appropriate knowledge and
skills
to due
with
many
contemporary issues such as environmental pollution and economic growth.
Secondly
, health care
also
a key factor should
be taken
into account. As a
negative
affect
accomulated
gradually
by human living activities, nowadays,
people
have to
face with
many
serious health problems which require a significant medical involvement in all around the world.
In this case
, the health care system do need a long term investment to
keep
up with the dynamic situation of global health.
In conclusion
, based on the importance of both entertainments and social services,
governments
should have a balanced expenditure to
keep
the society
developt
comprehensively
.