In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among the people on the subjects to be taught in universities. While some people argue that universities should teach subjects which is required in the job market, and some of the people argue that universities should teach subjects which they have interest in. On my point of view, universities should cater both the requirements, in this essay I shall discuss on factors in strengthening my argument.
First and foremost, there are myriad of advantages in university education. For example universities have to update their syllabus according to the market trends, if not the validity of the qualification will be deteriorated. Moreover, universities should make available courses related to technical sciences because there are lucrative opportunities available in the job market. In addition, universities can promote aesthetic subjects among their students, since entertainment business is one of the best businesses in this current context.
On the other hand, some people argue that universities should teach subjects in which the students have interests in, but on my point of view it is impractical for all the countries depending on the resources available in. For instance, if students have interest in space sciences, third world countries may not have sufficient resources to cater their requirements. Consequantely, though this approch is fair there are lot of practicle issues involved in this approach.
In conclusion, it is recommended to introduce new courses to universities after carrying out market researches in the job market together with sufficient theoratical and practical knowledge. It is also believed that government bear a huge responsibility in providing higher education opportunities to the younger generation because expenditure borne on education is considered as a investment for the future.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among the
people
on the
subjects
to
be taught
in
universities
. While
some
people
argue that
universities
should teach
subjects
which
is required
in the job
market
, and
some of the
people
argue that
universities
should teach
subjects
which they have interest in. On my point of view,
universities
should cater both the requirements, in this essay I shall discuss on factors in strengthening my argument.
First
and foremost, there are myriad of advantages in
university
education.
For example
universities
have to
update their syllabus according to the
market
trends, if not the validity of the qualification will
be deteriorated
.
Moreover
,
universities
should
make
available courses related to technical sciences
because
there are lucrative opportunities available in the job
market
.
In addition
,
universities
can promote aesthetic
subjects
among their students, since entertainment business is one of the best businesses in this
current
context.
On the other hand
,
some
people
argue that
universities
should teach
subjects
in which the students have interests in,
but
on my point of view it is impractical for all the countries depending on the resources available in.
For instance
, if students have interest in space sciences, third world countries may not have sufficient resources to cater their requirements.
Consequantely
, though this
approch
is
fair
there are
lot of
practicle
issues involved in this approach.
In conclusion
, it
is recommended
to introduce new courses to
universities
after carrying out
market
researches in the job
market
together with sufficient
theoratical
and practical knowledge. It is
also
believed that
government
bear a huge responsibility in providing higher education opportunities to the younger generation
because
expenditure borne on education
is considered
as
a
investment for the future.