While some museums have entrance fees, others have unpaid-entrance policy. Personally, I reckon that governments should enact an article to make all museums open to public freely because it attracts many tourists from all around the word, and spread the identity of the country.
On the one hand, Due to the fact that charging museums' visitors has some benefits, numerous authorities follow this policy. Once people are charged at every museum's entrance, this will attract only interested and aware category of people; therefore, they would treat existence as a gem, and they won’t cause any danger for shown masterpieces. Furthermore, in spite of the fact that many fees that is being charged for every museum isn't expensive, it helps to renew it from time to time. For example, once closed places were continuously cleaned and decorated, this would attract more visitors every year.
On the other hand, although charging people for historical places has number of merits, it still has plethora of drawbacks. Because numerous travelers these days seeks to the cheapest country to visit, imposing this kind of tax will reduce number of tourists. Consequently, income rate of tourism for any country would decline drastically. Moreover, since multi countries aim to publish their traditions and culture, they spend extremely high on their attractions merchandising. As governments issue new museums' levy, this sounds to be repellent for people who wish to visit that country. Hence, economical and cultural thrive of a certain country would inevitably decline unless encouraged authorities free-entrance policy.
In conclusion, although a few museums enable people to entre without incurring any cost, many are still insistent to charge their visitors. Personally, I see that paying at the museum's gate could cause adverse impact on economy and culture of any country.
While
some
museums
have entrance fees, others have unpaid-entrance policy.
Personally
, I reckon that
governments
should enact an article to
make
all
museums
open to public
freely
because
it attracts
many
tourists from all around the word, and spread the identity of the country.
On the one hand, Due to the fact that charging museums' visitors has
some
benefits, numerous authorities follow this policy. Once
people
are charged
at every museum's entrance, this will attract
only
interested and aware category of
people
;
therefore
, they would treat existence as a gem, and they won’t cause any
danger
for shown masterpieces.
Furthermore
,
in spite of
the fact that
many
fees
that is
being charged
for every
museum
isn't expensive, it
helps
to renew it from time to time.
For example
, once closed places were
continuously
cleaned and decorated, this would attract more visitors every year.
On the other hand
, although charging
people
for historical places has number of merits, it
still
has plethora of drawbacks.
Because
numerous travelers these days seeks to the cheapest
country
to visit, imposing this kind of tax will
reduce
number of tourists.
Consequently
, income rate of tourism for any
country
would decline
drastically
.
Moreover
, since multi
countries
aim to publish their traditions and culture, they spend
extremely
high on their attractions merchandising. As
governments
issue new museums' levy, this sounds to be repellent for
people
who wish to visit that
country
.
Hence
, economical and cultural thrive of a certain
country
would
inevitably
decline unless encouraged authorities free-entrance policy.
In conclusion
, although a few
museums
enable
people
to
entre
without incurring any cost,
many
are
still
insistent to charge their visitors.
Personally
, I
see
that paying at the museum's gate could cause adverse impact on economy and culture of any
country
.